AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 15 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.82207
Cite this article
1
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Zombie Argument Against Physicalism in the Philosophy of Mind: David Chalmers, Saul Kripke, and Robert Kirk

VEDAT ÇELEBİ1 Gül Yıldız2
Show Less
1 Erciyes Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 38280, Kayseri, Türkiye
2 Erciyes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü 38280, Kayseri, Türkiye
BIJP 2025, 15(3), 865–885; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.82207
Received: 23 May 2025 | Published online: 27 September 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This article focuses on the views of David Chalmers, Saul Kripke, and Robert Kirk regarding the zombie argument. Chalmers claims that subjective experience cannot be fully explained by physical processes, highlighting the “hard problem” of consciousness. Kripke questions the necessary identity between mental and physical states through his modal argument. Kirk, who initially used the zombie argument against physicalism, later adopted a more critical perspective. The article explores both the challenges the argument raises for materialist ontologies and its conceptual limitations. It concludes that understanding phenomenal consciousness requires acknowledging the explanatory limits of physicalism.

Keywords
Philosophy of mind
zombie argument
qualia problem
phenomenal consciousness.
References
  1.  Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219.
  2. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.
  3. Chalmers, D. J. (2010). The character of consciousness. Oxford University Press.
  4. Chalmers, D. J. (2018). The hard problem of consciousness. Içinde G. Rosen, A. Byrne, J. Cohen, E. Harman, & S. Shiffrin (Ed.), The Norton Introduction to Philosophy (2. bs, ss. 384-392). W. W. Norton & Company.
  5. Çelebi, V. (2017). Kripke’de özel adlar, fiziksel durumlar ve zihinsel durumlar için ileri sürülen özdeşlik tezi tartışması. Beytulhikme: An International Journal of Philosophy, 7(2), 51-74.
  6. Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal Qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, 32(127), 127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960077
  7. Kirk, R. (2005). Zombies and consciousness. Clarendon Press.
  8. Kirk, R. (2008). The inconceivability of zombies. Philosophical Studies, 139(1), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9103-2
  9. Kirk, R., & Squires, J. E. R. (1974). Zombies v. Materialists. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 48(1), 135-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/48.1.135
  10. Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.
  11. Levine, J. (1983). MATERIALISM AND QUALIA: THE EXPLANATORY GAP. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64(4), 354-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1983.tb00207.x
  12. Pals, G. (2016). The zombie argument: A discussion of the soundness of the zombie argument [Lisans Tezi]. Utrecht Üniversitesi.

 

Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing