AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 14 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.78057
Cite this article
2
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Philosophy of The Story: Self-Disclosure and Ethical Codes in Autoethnography

Mehmet Ali Sevgi1
Show Less
1 Iğdır Üniversitesi, İlahiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Bölümü 76000, Iğdır, Türkiye
BIJP 2024, 14(3), 835–854; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.78057
Received: 24 August 2024 | Published online: 26 September 2024
© 2024 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Autoethnography is a method based on the instrumentalization of the researcher's own subjectivity. The fact that the researcher places his/her own experiences and emotions at the center of the research is emphasized as the most prominent feature that distinguishes autoethnography from traditional ethnographies. This study aims to discuss the theoretical, methodological, and ethical aspects of autoethnography, its potential in social sciences, and how texts that can be written with this method can be evaluated. In this context, this study aims to contribute to the debates on the politicization of representation in social sciences, to draw a general framework for the approaches of researchers who will use this method, and to discuss the ethical issues they should observe. Theoretical, formal, and ethical discussions of autoethnography, which is considered as an effective method in making cultural groups that are considered marginal, coded as the other and whose voices are lost among the strict rules of academic texts more visible, will contribute to the discussions that may arise on the use of the method in social sciences.

Keywords
Autoethnography
ethnography
privacy
representation
storytelling
personal experiences.
References
  1. Adams, T. E., Jones, S. H., & Ellis, C. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of     Autoethnography (1st edition). Routledge.
  2. Agger, B. (2013). A Critical Theory Of Public Life. Routledge.
  3. Alcoff, L. (1991). The Problem of Speaking for Others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221
  4. Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449
  5. Archetti, E. P. (Ed.). (1994). Exploring the Written: Anthropology & the Multiplicity of Writing. Scandinavian Univ Pr.
  6. Barthes, R. (1997). Image-Music-Text (S. Heath, Çev.). Fontana Press.
  7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  8. Boylorn, R. M., & Orbe, M. P. (Ed.). (2014). Critical Autoethnography. Left Coast Press.
  9. Burnier, D. (2006). Encounters With the Self in Social Science Research: A Political Scientist Looks at Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 410-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286982
  10. Ceyhan, Ç., Anbarlı, Z. Ö., & Ova, N. (2017). Zamanın İzinde Kenti Deneyimlemek: Kent ve Bellek Üzerine Oto-Etnografik Bakışlar. Moment Dergi, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17572/moment.411577
  11. Çelikcan, H., & Aksoy, Ş. (2020). Sanat Temelli Araştırma Yöntemi “Otoetnografi”. Journal of Arts, 3(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.31566/arts.3.023
  12. Dauphinee, E. (2010). The ethics of autoethnography. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 799-818. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000690
  13. de Certeau, M. (2002). The Practice of Everyday Life (S. Rendall, Çev.; 2. bs). University of California Press.
  14. Denshire, S. (2014). On auto-ethnography. Current Sociology, 62(6), 831-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533339
  15. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.). (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  16. Duncan, M. (2004). Autoethnography: Critical Appreciation of an Emerging Art. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(4), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300403
  17. Ellingson, L. L. (2006). Embodied Knowledge: Writing Researchers’ Bodies Into Qualitative Health Research. Qualitative Health Research, 16(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305281944
  18. Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. Rowman Altamira.
  19. Ellis, C. (2007). Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research With Intimate Others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947
  20. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4 (138)), 273-290.
  21. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (Ed.). (1996). Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. AltaMira Press.
  22. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. İçinde N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (1-2, ss. 733-768). SAGE.
  23. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (Ed.). (2001). Ethnographically Speaking: Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics (0416th edition). AltaMira Press.
  24. Ellis, C. S., & Bochner, A. P. (2006). Analyzing Analytic Autoethnography: An Autopsy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286979
  25. Gannon, S. (2006). The (Im)Possibilities of Writing the Self-Writing: French Poststructural Theory and Autoethnography. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 6(4), 474-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605285734
  26. Holman-Jones, S. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. Içinde The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (ss. 763-792). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/autoethnography-making-the-personal-political
  27. Iser, W. (1993). The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology (First Edition). Johns Hopkins University Press.
  28. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3. bs). The University of Chicago Press.
  29. Lionnet, F. (2019). 6. Autoethnography: The An-archic Style of Dust Tracks on a Road. İçinde D. LaCapra (Ed.), The Bounds of Race (ss. 164-195). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501727481-008
  30. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Çev.). University of Minnesota Press.
  31. McIlveen, P. (2008). Autoethnography as a Method for Reflexive Research and Practice in Vocational Psychology. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(2), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/103841620801700204
  32. Méndez, M. G. (2014). Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a09
  33. Neumanm, M. (1996). Collecting ourselves at the end of the century. Içinde C. Ellis & A. P. Bochner (Ed.), Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing (ss. 172-198). AltaMira Press.
  34. Pratt, M. L. (2007). Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation (2nd edition). Routledge.
  35. Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social (1st edition). Routledge.
  36. Richardson, L. (2000). New Writing Practices in Qualitative Research. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.17.1.5
  37. Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. Içinde The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (ss. 959-978). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/autoethnography-making-the-personal-political
  38. Russell, C. (1999). Autoethnography: Journeys of the Self. Experimental ethnography. http://www.haussite.net/haus.0/SCRIPT/txt2001/01/russel.HTML
  39. Sevgi, M. A. (2022). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Pratiği Olarak Kurgu: Antropolojide Edebi Söylem (e). Teorik Yaklaşımlar, 25-38.
  40. Sparkes, A. C. (2002). Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or something more? İçinde C. Ellis & A. P. Bochner (Ed.), Ethnographically Speaking: Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics (ss. 209-232). AltaMira Press.
  41. Sparkes, A. C. (2013). Autoethnography at the Will of the Body. Içinde N. P. Short, L. Turner, & A. Grant (Ed.), Contemporary British Autoethnography (ss. 203-211). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-410-9_13
  42. Tolich, M. (2010). A Critique of Current Practice: Ten Foundational Guidelines for Autoethnographers. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1599-1610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310376076
  43. Turgut, B. H. (2022). Kadın Araştırmalarında Meta-Diyalojik Yöntem Arayışları: Bir Alan Deneyimi Olarak Otoetnografi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 25, Article 25.
  44. Turner, L. (2013). The Evocative Autoethnographic I. Içinde N. P. Short, L. Turner, & A. Grant (Ed.), Contemporary British Autoethnography (ss. 213-229). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-410-9_14
  45. Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press.
  46. Wall, S. (2008). Easier Said than Done: Writing an Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103
  47. Wyatt, J. (2006). Psychic Distance, Consent, and Other Ethical Issues: Reflections on the Writing of “A Gentle Going?” Qualitative Inquiry, 12(4), 813-818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406288630
  48. Yavuz, O. (2019). Otoetnografik Yaklaşımda Fotoğrafın Yeri ve Yöntemi Üzerine: Pıa Arke’nin Çifte Kimliği. Moment Dergi, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17572//mj2019.2.470491
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing