Hegel's Idea of the Constitution and its Historical Background
Modern state debates within the context of the restriction of power take the problem of the constitution as a fundamental issue. Historically, ongoing philosophical debates on the nature of the constitution predominantly share the same ground with the law theory; both based on the idea of a “constitutional state” or a “constitutional state”. Another approach that distinguishes itself in the philosophical context is the approach based on the idea that the state and the constitution are essentially identical. Hegel had this idea that the state and the constitution are essentially identical in light of the ongoing debates in Germany in his era. In this study, an examination of the origin and the context of Hegel's idea of the constitution will be presented. It will be argued that this historical approach reveals a certain process in terms of the course of the modern state debate.
- Akbaş, K. (2016). Friedrich Carl Von Savigny: Tarihsel Hukuk Okulu Geleneği İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, LXXIV(1).
- Burg, D. F. (2004). A World History Of Tax Rebellions. London: Taylor & Francis Books Inc.
- Crosby, M. B. (2008). The Making of a German Constitution: A Slow Revolution. Oxford: Berg.
- Dickey, L. (1987). Hegel: Religion, Economics, Politics1770-1807 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Froeb, C. v. (2008). Hegel: Bir Yaşam Öyküsü. Monokl(Hegel Özel Sayısı), 8-22.
- Hegel, G. W. F. (2004). Political Writings (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge Cambridge University Press
- Hegel, G. W. F. (2006). Tüze Felsefesi (A. Yardımlı, Trans.). İstanbul: İdea.
- Hegel, G. W. F. (2009). Heidelberg Writings: Journal Publications (B. Bowman, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jacobsohn, G. J. (2006). Constitutional Identity. The Review of Politics, 68(3), 361-397.
- Kaboğlu, İ. Ö. (2016). Yerli ve milli anayasa çelişkisi. Birgün Gazetesi. Retrieved from https://www.birgun.net/haber-detay/yerli-ve-milli-anayasa-celiskisi-102746.html
- Kantorowicz, H. (1937). Savigny and The Historical School of Law. Law Quarterly Reviwev(53).
- Lestititon, S. (1993). Kant and the End of the Enlightenment in Prussia. Journal of Modern History(65).
- McNeely, I. F. (2004). Hegel's Württemberg Commentary: Intellectuals and the Construction of Civil Society in Revolutionary-Napoleonic Germany. Central European History, 37(3).
- Moers, C. (1991). The Making of Bourgeois Europe: Absolutism, Revolution, and the Rise of Capitalism in England, France and Germany. London, New York: Verso.
- Pinkard, T. (2012). Hegel (M. B. Albayrak, Trans.). Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
- Rubenfeld, J. (2002). Two Conceptions of Constitutionalism. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 96, 394-396.
- Shaw, M. S. a. J. J. A. (1994). Towards a Critical Theory of Constitutional Law: Hegel's Contribution. Journal of Law and Society, 21(4), 464-486.
- Smith, S. B. (1989). Hegel's Critique of Liberalism. London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Ünsalan, F. (2007). Hegel'in Erken Dönem Eserleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme. (MA Thesis). Kocaeli: Kocaeli University.
- Weil, E. (1998). Hegel and The State (M. A. Cohen, Trans.). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.