AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 9 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1467
Cite this article
31
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Problem of Change of Enduring and Perduring Objects 

Ali Suat Gözcü1
Show Less
1 Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 49100, Muş , Turkey
BIJP 2019, 9(2), 377–392; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1467
Received: 23 January 2019 | Published online: 26 June 2019
© 2019 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

As we see in contemporary discussions about identity and persistence, we encounter some important problems when the concepts of change and continuity are considered in the same context. In these discussions, some different approaches have emerged about how the relationship between temporal parts is established, how objects maintain their unity throughout the change, and how qualitative continuity can be explained temporally. Thus, in these discussions, some argue that the change is achieved by the correlation of different temporal parts that are spread throughout space-time; and others think that the change can be possible if objects gain or lose some properties in a single space and time division. So, in this paper, we will first focus on the discussion about the change between these two different views. Secondly, as we have seen in the theory of persistence, we will try to show the changing and unchanging aspects of the temporal parts.

Keywords
Time
temporal parts
change
qualitative relation
continuity.
References
  1. Aristoteles. (2005). Fizik. (Çev: S. Babür). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  2. Balashov, Y. (2000). Persistence and Space-Time: Philosophical Lessons of the Pole and Barn.     The Monist. 83, 321-243.
  3. Deng, N. (2018). What is temporal ontology?. Philosophical Studies. 175 (3), 793-807
  4. Gözcü, A. S. (2016). A- ve B- Zaman Teorileri. Özne: Felsefe Bilim ve Sanat Yazıları         Dergisi. 25, 339-355.
  5. Harrison, J. (2004). Time, Change, and the Constitution. Virgina Law Review. 90 (6), 1601     -1612.
  6. Haslanger, S. (1989). Persistence, Change, and Explanation. Philosophical Studies: An   International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 56 (1), 1 - 28.
  7. Hawley, K. (2001). How Things Persist. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  8. Hirsch, E. (1982). The Concept of Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Inwagen, P. v. (2009). Metaphysics. Boulder: Westview Press.
  10. Macmurray, R. B. (1928). Time and Change. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,       Supplementary Volumes. 8, 143-188.
  11. Kennedy, J. B. (2003). Space, Time and Einstein. Chesham: Acumen Publishing Limited.
  12. Lewis, D. K. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
  13. Lowe, E. J. (2006). Endurantism versus Perdurantism and The Nature of the Time. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica. 98(4), 713-727.
  14. Miller, K. L. (2006). Issues in Theoretical Diversity: Peristence, Composition, and Time. Netherlands: Springer.
  15. Newton-Smith, W. H. (1980). The Structure of Time. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  16. Olson, E. T. (2006). Temporal Parts and Timeless Parthood.  Noûs. 40 (4), 738-752.
  17. Rea., M. C. (2003). Four-Dimensionalism. The Oxford Hanbook of Metaphysics. New York:  Oxford University Press.
  18. Russell, B. (1915). On Experience of Time. The Monist. 25 (2), 212-233
  19. Teichmann, R. (1993). Time and Change. The Philosophical Quarterly. 43 (171), 158-177
  20. Turetzky, P. (1998). Time, London: Routledge.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing