AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 9 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1436
Cite this article
42
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Animals and Our Certain Practical Obligations to Animals in Christine M. Korsgaard 

Barış Mutlu1
Show Less
1 Van YYÜ, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, Sahne Sanatları Bölümü 65080, Van , Turkey
BIJP 2019, 9(1), 147–179; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1436
Received: 30 October 2018 | Published online: 6 March 2019
© 2019 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

C. M. Korsgaard is a Kantian philosopher, she proceeds in her works with the guidance of Kant, and by this guidance, she argues important subjects as “agent and identity”, “self”, “normativity”, “practical reason”, and “animals”. In her works she especially argues that normativity has a necessary relationship with human nature, it has a psychological power in human nature as a form of necessity, it functions as the creator of the human soul. Korsgaard believes that: Only the rational person reaches to “the normative principles, laws which will govern the things she/he does and believes”, he/she has the skill “to normatively manage himself/herself”. This skill is not available in other non-human animals; they all do not have a capacity of reason, rationality rather they only act with their evolutionary instincts, their natural structures. Korsgaard, however, says that we must not exaggerate this difference and that this difference does not make us morally superior to them. For animals, like us, value their lives, pursuit certain goods and ends, live with certain functions (ergon). In this paper, we will see the Kantian theory which Korsgaard argues about animals.

 

Keywords
Korsgaard
morality
rationality
animals
obligation.
References
  1. Hughes, A. [yön.] (2018). Alfa Kurt (Alpha). USA: Warner Bros..
  2. Coetzee, J. M. (1999). The Lives of Animals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  3. De Waal, F. (2006). Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. (Ed. S. Macedo & J. Ober). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  4. Erkızan, H. N. (2012). Aristoteles’ten Nussbaum’a İnsan. İstanbul: Sentez Yayıncılık.
  5. Kant, I. (2002). Ahlâk Metafiziğinin Temellendirilmesi. (Çev. İ. Kuçuradi). Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu Yayınları.
  6. Korsgaard, C. M. (2000). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Korsgaard, C. M. (2008). The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Korsgaard, C. M. (2006). Morality and the Distinctiveness of Human Action. F. De Waal. Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. (Ed. S. Macedo & J. Ober). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 98-119.
  9. Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Korsgaard, C. M. (2012) (Online Pub. Date). Interacting with Animals: A Kantian Account. The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. (Eds. T. L. Beacuhamp & R. G. Frey). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91-118.
  11. Korsgaard, C. M. (2013). Kantian Ethics, Animals, and the Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33 (4), 629-648.
  12. Korsgaard C. M. (2018). Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Harari, Y. N. (2015). Hayvanlardan Tanrılara Sapiens: İnsan Türünün Kısa Bir Tarihi. (Çev. E. Genç). İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
  14. MacIntyre, A. (2002). Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: Open Court.
  15. Mutlu, B. (2015). Martha Nussbaum’da İyi Yaşam ve Talih. (Yayınlanmamış DrT). İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi.
  16. Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  17. Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). (Online Pub. Date). The Capabilities Approach and Animal Entitlements. The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. (Eds. T. L. Beacuhamp & R. G. Frey). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 228-250.
  18. Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  19. Regan, T. (2004). The Case for Animal Rights. California: University of California Press.
  20. Regan, T. (2007). Kafesler Boşalsın: Hayvan Haklarıyla Yüzleşmek. (Çev. S. Çağlayan). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  21. Singer, P. (2005). Hayvan Özgürleşmesi. (Çev. H. Doğan). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  22. Sorabji, R. (1993). Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing