AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 15 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.78008
Cite this article
9
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

"Philosophy Always Begins in the Middle”: Friedrich Schlegel’s Anti-Foundationalist Philosophy

ALİ HAN BABUÇÇU1
Show Less
1 Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fak., Felsefe Bölümü 46100, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye
Received: 21 August 2024 | Published online: 25 March 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Schlegel’s philosophical thought is characterized by opposition to the thought of Fichte. Schlegel constructs an anti-foundationalist philosophy against Fichte’s foundationalist philosophy which claims to reach inevitable conclusions from a first principle. He develops a conception of philosophy that has no definite starting point and no absolute first principle. In this approach, each principle supports and validates the others. Much like poetry, philosophy starts from the middle. Schlegel argues that the principles are not one but many and that they mutually establish themselves in interaction. He emphasizes that everything, including all principles, is in a constant state of change and transformation. This highlights the awareness of the impossibility of ultimately reaching the Absolute. The Absolute will shape all our efforts, even though it will never be attainable. Nevertheless, the effort to reach the Absolute will not be abandoned and philosophy, which acquires a literary/poetic character, will become the center of this effort. Schlegel's use of literary forms can thus be seen as a challenge. Aiming to erode the ways of philosophizing of his contemporaries, notably Fichte, Schlegel intends to establish a philosophy that gives life the respect it deserves. This new kind of philosophy will not remain a purely intellectual activity, but will be the central element in the effort to transform life and restore its lost enchantment.

Keywords
Early German romantics
Friedrich Schlegel
anti-foundationalism
Wechselerweis
philosophy and literature.
References
  1. Behler, E. (1993). German Romantic Literary Theory. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Beiser, F. C. (2002). German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjecivism 1781-1801. Harvard University Press.
  3. Beiser, F. C. (2003). The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism. Harvard University Press.
  4. Euron, P. (2019). Aesthetics, Theory and Interpretation of the Literary Work. Brill.
  5. Frank, M. (1996). "ALLE WAHRHEIT IST RELATIV, ALLES WISSEN SYMBOLISCH": Motive der Grundsatz- Skepsis in der frühen Jenaer Romantik (1796). Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 403-436.
  6. Frank, M. (2004). Early German Romanticism and Its Philosophical Foundations. (E. Millan-Zaibert, Trans.) State University of New York Press.
  7. Millan-Brusslan, E. (2019). Poetry and Imagination in Fichte and the Early German Romantics: A Reassessment. In G. Genrty, & K. Pollok, The Imagination in German Idealism and Romanticism (pp. 208-224). Cambridge University Press.
  8. Millan-Zaibert, E. (2007). Friedrich Schlegel and the Emergence of Romantic Philosophy. State University of New York Press.
  9. Nancy, J.-L., & Lacoue-Labarthe, P. (1988). The Literary Absolute. State University of New York Press.
  10. Nassar, D. (2014). The Romantic Absolute. The University of Chicago Press.
  11. Novalis. (1997). Logological Fragments I. In Novalis, Philosophical Writings (M. M. Stoljar, Trans.). State University of New York Press.
  12. Novalis. (2010). Vermischte Bemerkungen. In Novalis, & C. Paschek (Ed.), Fragmente und Studien & Die Christenheit Oder Europa. Reclam.
  13. Schlegel, F. (1967a). Die Athenäums-Fragmente. In F. Schlegel, & E. Behler (Ed.), Kritische-Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe 2: Charakteristiken Und Kritiken. Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.
  14. Schlegel, F. (1967b). Gespräch über Poesie. In F. Schlegel, & E. Behler (Ed.), Kritische-Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe 2: Charakteristiken Und Kritiken. Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.
  15. Schlegel, F. (1967c). Jacobis Woldemar. In F. Schlegel, & E. Behler (Ed.), Kritische-Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe 2: Charakteristiken Und Kritiken. Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.
  16. Schlegel, F. (1967d). Lyceums-Fragmente. In F. Schlegel, & E. Behler (Ed.), Kritische-Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe 2: Charakteristiken Und Kritiken. Verlag Ferdinand Schöning.
  17. Schlegel, F. (1967e). Philosophische Fragmente Ersthe Epoche II. In F. Schlegel, & E. Behler (Ed.), Kritische-Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe 18: Philosophische Lehrjahre 1796-1806. Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.
  18. Schlegel, F. (1967f). Zur Logik Und Philosophie 1796. In F. Schlegel, & E. Behler (Ed.), Kritische-Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe 18: Philosophische Lehrjahre 1796-1806. Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.
  19. Schlegel, F. (1971). Friedrich Schelegel's Lucinde and the Fragments. (P. Firchow, Trans.) University of Minnesotta Press.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing