AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 15 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.78711
Cite this article
2
Download
15
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

New Ontological Searches and Object-Oriented Ontology: Graham Harman's Perspective

ÖNER GÜLER1
Show Less
1 Bartın Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 74110, Bartın, Türkiye
Received: 7 October 2024 | Published online: 25 March 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study aims to deal with the new ontological searches that have begun to emerge in the field of philosophy in general terms and, in particular, to reveal how the object-oriented ontology view, which is one of these movements, differs from these movements. For this purpose, first of all, the general outlines of the new materialism, speculative realism, speculative materialism movements, which are called new ontological pursuits, and their differences with classical philosophy will be discussed. Afterward, the object-oriented ontology, which can be considered within these movements, and the views of Graham Harman, who is at the basis of this idea, will be focussed on. While discussing Harman's views, the main focus will be on his conception of the new object, which is claimed to be the main difference that distinguishes him from the other ontological movements mentioned above, and the concept of metaphor he proposes to know this object.

Keywords
Graham Harman
object-oriented ontology
metaphor
ontology
realism.
References
  1. Benson, M. H. (2019). New Materialism: An Ontology for the Anthropocene. Natural Resources Journal, 58(2), 251-280.
  2. Braver, L. (2007). A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism. Northwestern University Press.
  3. Bryant, L. (2011). The Ontic Principle: Outline of an Object-Oriented Ontology. Içinde The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism.
  4. Connolly, W. E. (2013). The “New Materialism” and the Fragility of Things. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813486849
  5. Descartes, R. (1981). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (C. 3). Cambridge University Press.
  6. Dummett, M. (1981). The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
  7. Ferraris, M. (2019). Yeni Gerçekçilik Manifestosu. Kolektif Kitap.
  8. Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2018). New materialism. Içinde P. A. Atkinsom, S. Delamont, Hardy M.A., & Williams M. (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Methods. Sage.
  9. Gabriel, M. (2018). Dünyanın Neden Varolmadığı Üzerine. Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  10. Gamble, C. N., Hanan, J. S., & Nail, T. (2019). What is New Materialism? Angelaki - Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 24(6), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2019.1684704
  11. Garcia, T. (2014). Form and object: A treatise on things. Içinde Form and Object: A Treatise on Things. Edimburgh University Press.
  12. Gasset, J. O. y. (1975). An Essay in Esthetics by Way of a Preface. Içinde Phenomenology and Art. W. W. Norton & Company.
  13. Grant, I. H. (2010). Speculative Realism. The Philosophers’ Magazine, 50, 58-59. https://doi.org/10.5840/tpm20105056
  14. Harman, G. (t.y.). Guerrilla Metaphysics Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things.
  15. Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and The Metaphyics of Objects. Open Court.
  16. Harman, G. (2008). On the Horror of Phenomenology: Lovecraft and Husserl. Collapse, IV, 333-364.
  17. Harman, G. (2009). Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. re.press.
  18. Harman, G. (2010). Time, Space, Essence, and Eidos: A New Theory of Causation. The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 6(1). www.cosmosandhistory.org
  19. Harman, G. (2011a). On the Undermining of Objects: Grant, Bruno, and Radical Philosophy. Içinde The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism.
  20. Harman, G. (2011b). Plastic Surgery for the Monadology Leibniz via Heidegger. Cultural Studies Review, 17(1), 211-229. http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/csrj/
  21. Harman, G. (2011c). Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the Making. Edinburgh University Press.
  22. Harman, G. (2011d). Realism without Materialism. SubStance #125, 40(2), 52-72.
  23. Harman, G. (2011e). The Quadruple Object. Zero Books.
  24. Harman, G. (2011f). The Road to Objects. Continent, 3(1), 171-179.
  25. Harman, G. (2012). On Vicarious Causation. Collapse, 2, 187-221.
  26. Harman, G. (2016). Immaterialism. Polity Press.
  27. Harman, G. (2020a). Nesne Yönelimli Ontoloji. Tellekt.
  28. Harman, G. (2020b). Skirmishes. Içinde Punctumbooks. Punctum Books. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.001%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.055%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.006%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127252%0Ahttp://dx.doi.o
  29. Harman, G. (2023). The Current State of Speculative Realism. Içinde Speculations IV (ss. 22-28). https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2353969.6
  30. Harman, G., & DeLanda, M. (2017). The Rise of Realism. Polity Press.
  31. Heidegger, M. (2018). Varlık ve Zaman. Alfa Yayınları.
  32. Kant, I. (1977). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Hackett.
  33. Kant, I. (2010). Arı Usun Eleştirisi. İdea Yayınevi.
  34. Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.
  35. Latour, B. (2008). Biz Hiç Modern Olmadık. Norgunk Yayıncılık.
  36. Latour, B. (2021). Toplumsalı Yeniden Toplama: Aktör-Ağ Teorisine Bir Giriş. Tellekt.
  37. Leibniz, G. W. (2011). Monadoloji ve İlgili Yazılar, Mektuplar. Pinhan Yayıncılık.
  38. Meillassoux, Q. (2020). Sonluluğun Sonrası. Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
  39. Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press.
  40. Rosi, B. (2018). İnsan Sonrası. Kolektif Kitap.
  41. Shaviro, S. (2024, Ağustos 14). Consequences of Panpsychism. http://www.shaviro.com/Othertexts/Claremont2010.pdf.
  42. Tillman, R. (2015). Toward a New Materialism: Matter as Dynamic. Minding Nature, 8(1).
  43. Young, N. (2021). Object, Reduction, and Emergence: An Object-Oriented View. Içinde Open Philosophy (C. 4, Sayı 1, ss. 83-93). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0159
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing