AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 15 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.86560
Cite this article
1
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

From Doxa to Post-Truth: The Epistemic Frailty of the Human Mind

ZEYNEP BERKE1
Show Less
1 Bağımsız Araştırmacı, Türkiye
BIJP 2025, 15(4), 1381–1402; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.86560
Received: 25 July 2025 | Published online: 29 December 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Post-truth is a multifaceted and multi-layered problematic that encompasses not only factors unique to our age, but also elements that have accompanied the biological and cultural history of humanity from the very beginning. Existing literature on post-truth largely focuses on external factors such as political manipulations, media strategies and social dynamics, while the cognitive tendencies that play a central role in the emergent epistemic crisis are usually only partially and limitedly addressed. Yet, the sole reason for the devaluation of truth is not external manipulations, but also the cognitive biases inherent in our mental structuring and the epistemic frailty that emerges under their influence. This finding is important in that it transforms the phenomenon of post-truth from being solely a problem of misinformation into an issue originating from the very structure of the human mind. Thus, the main purpose of this study is to reveal how cognitive biases actively shape the ways in which individuals select, interpret and reject information, and to address the individual and social strategies that can be used to combat the negative consequences of these biases.

Keywords
Post-truth
mind
cognitive bias
epistemic frailty
critical thinking.
References
  1. Asch, S. (1955). Opinions and Social Pressure. 193(5), 31-35.
  2. Augustine. (2019). Confessions. Hackett Publishing Company.
  3. Bach, K. (2009). Self-Deception. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, ed. Ansgar Beckermann, Brian P. McLaughlin, and Sven Walter. Oxford University Press.
  4. Bacon, F. (2003). The New Organon. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Baggini, J. (2017). A Short History of Truth: Consolations for a Post-Truth World. Quercus Publishing.
  6. Bengston, E. (2017). The Epistemology of Rhetoric Plato, Doxa and Post-Truth. University Press of Colorado.
  7. Demirkol, O. (2022). Yanlış Bilincin “Aydınlanmış” Hali: Bir Semptom Olarak “Post-Truth.” Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, 36, 139-163.
  8. Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
  9. Güven, A. (2020). Hakikatin Yitimi Olarak Post-Truth: Bir Kavramsallaştırma Denemesi. İnsan&İnsan, 7(23), 20-36.
  10. Keyes, R. (2004). The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. St. Martin’s Press.
  11. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U., Seifert, C., Schwartz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131.
  12. Lodge, M., Taber, C., & Weber, C. (2006). First Steps toward a Dual-Process Accessibility Model of Political Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior. In Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing, ed. David Redlawsk. Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Luntz, F. (2007). Words That Work: It’s Not What You Say, It’s What People Hear. Hachette Books.
  14. McComiskey, B. (2017). Post-Truth Rhetoric and Composition. University Press of Colorado.
  15. Mcintyre, L. (2018). Post-Truth. The MIT Press.
  16. Papish, L. (2018). Kant on Evil, Self- Deception, and Moral Reform. Oxford University Press.
  17. Peters, F. (2004). Antik Yunan Felsefesi Terimleri Sözlüğü. Paradigma Yayıncılık.
  18. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
  19. Tesich, S. (1992). A Government of Lies. The Nation, 12-14.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing