AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 15 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.82271
Cite this article
1
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Criticisms of Frege's Antipsychologism

Mahmut Sami Özdil1
Show Less
1 Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Ahmet Keleşoğlu İlahiyat Fak., Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri 42090, Konya, Türkiye
BIJP 2025, 15(4), 1357–1380; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.82271
Received: 26 May 2025 | Published online: 29 December 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This article examines Gottlob Frege’s arguments against psychologism and surveys a range of modern critiques and reinterpretations of his position. Frege holds that logic comprises normative and universal laws, independent of individual psychological processes. In contrast, psychologism seeks to ground logic in mental activity, which Frege decisively rejects, proposing instead that meanings and truths reside in an objective “third realm.” The article discusses responses from five key perspectives: Husserl, Quine, Dummett, Putnam, and the trio Pelletier, Elio, and Hanson. These thinkers either reinforce, revise, or challenge Frege’s core assumptions regarding logic, truth, and meaning. While Frege's antipsychologism had a formative role in 20th-century logic and philosophy of language, contemporary debates show a more nuanced spectrum of positions, reevaluating the boundaries between logic and psychology.

Keywords
Logic
meaning
truth
psychologism
antipsychologism.
References
  1. Conant, J. (1992). The Search for Logically Alien Thought. Philosophical Topics, 20(1), 115-180. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19922015
  2. Devitt, M. (1990). Meanings Just Ain’t in the Head. İçinde G. Boolos (Ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam (ss. 79-104). Cambridge University Press.
  3. Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language. Harper & Row.
  4. Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Duckworth.
  5. Dummett, M. (1993). Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
  6. Dummett, M. A. E. (1973). Frege; philosophy of language. Harper & Row.
  7. Frege, G. (1948). Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485
  8. Frege, G. (1956). The Thought: A Logical Inquiry. Mind, 65(259), 289-311.
  9. Frege, G. (1972). Review of Dr. E. Husserl’s Philosophy of Arithmetic (E. W. Kluge, Çev.). Mind, 81(323), 321-337.
  10. Frege, G. (2017). Aritmetiğin Temelleri (B. Gözkan, Çev.). Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  11. Geach, P. T. (1976). Critical Notice of “Frege: Philosophy of Language”. Mind, 85(339), 436-449.
  12. Green, K. (2001). Dummett: Philosophy of Language. Polity.
  13. Haack, S. (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812866
  14. Husserl, E. (2012a). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (R. B. Gibson, Çev.). Routledge classics.
  15. Husserl, E. (2012b). Logical investigations, volume 1 (D. Moran, Ed.; J. N. Findlay, Çev.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  16. Kripke, S. A. (2024). The Question of Logic. Mind, 133(529), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzad008
  17. Kusch, M. (2024). Psychologism. İçinde E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/psychologism/
  18. Ma, J. (2024). A comparison of Frege and Putnam’s anti-psychologism. International Journal of Mathematics and Systems Science, 7(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.18686/ijmss.v7i8.8579
  19. Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4124.001.0001
  20. Öberg, A. (2011). Hilary Putnam on Meaning and Necessity [PhD Thesis, Uppsala University]. https://philarchive.org/rec/BERHPO-3
  21. Özdi̇l, M. S. (2022). Frege’nin Psikolojizm Karşıtlığı ve Bunun Mantığın Konusu ile İlişkisi. Bilimname, 48, 267-289. https://doi.org/10.28949/bilimname.1135884
  22. Pelletier, F. J., Elio, R., & Hanson, P. (2008). Is Logic all in our Heads? From Naturalism to Psychologism. Studia Logica, 88(1), 3-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9098-5
  23. Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Putnam, H. (1978). There Is at Least One a priori Truth. Erkenntnis, 13(1), 153-170.
  25. Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625398
  26. Quine, W. V. (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906
  27. Quine, W. V. (1952). Methods Of Logic. Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited. http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.188305
  28. Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and Object. Preface to the New Edition by Dagfinn Føllesdal. M.I.T. Press.
  29. Quine, W. V. (1969). Epistemology Naturalized. İçinde Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press. https://philarchive.org/rec/QUIEN
  30. Samuels, R. (2000). Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychology and cognitive architecture. İçinde A. Chamberlain & P. Carruthers (Ed.), Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition (ss. 13-46). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611926.003
  31. Sullivan, P. (2010). Dummett’s Frege. İçinde M. Potter & T. Ricketts (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Frege (ss. 86-117). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521624282.004
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing