Reconsidering Avicennan Theory of Science: Ṣadr al-Sharīʿa and Taftāzānī’s Discussions of the Issue of the Subject Matter
Post-classical period witnessed intense debates on aspects of the Avicennan theory of science. Among them one set of discussions concerned the issue of subject matter (mabāhith al-mawdūʿ) in a science. They were raised by Ṣadr al-Sharīʿa (d. 747/1346) in the introduction of his al-Tawḍīh, a commentary on his legal theory text al-Tanqīḥ. Therein, he raised three questions: (1) whether the subject matter of a science can be multiple, (2) what restricting subject matter of a science means, and (3) whether one thing can be the subject matter of multiple sciences. Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390), a proponent of the Avicennan theory, objected to Ṣadr al-Sharīʿa’s positions in his al-Talwīḥ, the most well-known supercommentary on al-Tawḍīh. The paper analyzes this debate on the issue of subject matter in sciences, and thus sheds light on the reception of an important aspect of the Avicennan theory of science in the postclassical period.
- al-Bukhārī, ʿAlā al-Dīn Muhammad b. Muhammad. (n.d.). Risāla fi Daf’i i’tirādāt sāhib al-talwīh “alā al-mabāhith al-thalātha al-mukhtara’a fī mabhath al-mawdū” li-sāhib al-tawdīh. Suleymaniye Library MS Laleli 716.
- Aristotle. (1993). Posterior Analytics (J. Barnes, Ed.; 2nd ed.).
- Aristotle. (1999). al-Nass al-Kāmil li-Mantiq Aristū (F. Jabr, Ed.; Vol. 1).
- Eshera, O. (2023). Philosophical and Philological Debates on Kulliyyāt I.1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn: From Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī to Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī. Oriens. https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-12340025
- Fârâbî. (2008). Kitâbu’l-Burhân (Ö. Türker & Ö. M. Alper, Eds.). Klasik Yayınları.
- İbn Rüşd. (2015). İkinci Analitikler’in Orta Şerhi: Telhîsu Kitâbi’l-Burhân (H. Kaya, Ed.). Klasik Yayınları.
- İbn Sînâ. (2006). Kitâbu’ş-Şifâ II. Analitikler (Ö. Türker, Ed.). Litera Yayıncılık.
- Katib Çelebi. (1943). Kashf al-Zunūn.
- Köksal, A. C. (2021). Fıkıh Usulünün Mahiyeti ve Gayesi (4th ed.). İSAM Yayınları.
- Odabaş, Ö. (2021). İbn Sîna’da Bilimsel Yönteme Giriş Konu İlke ve Mesele. Litera Yayıncılık.
- Ṣadr al-Sharīʿa. (1906). Sharh al-Tawdih ‘ala l-Tanqih li-Ṣadr al-Sharīʿa Ubaydullah b. Mas’ud wa alayhi al-Talwih li l-Imam Sa’d al-Din al-Taftāzānī wa Hashiyat al-Fanari ‘ala al-Talwih wa Hashiyat Mulla Khusraw wa ‘Abd al-Hakim alayhi Aydan. al-Matba’a al-Khayriyya.
- Strobino, R. (2017). Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Burhān, II. 7 and Its Latin Translation by Gundissalinus: Content and Text. Documenti e Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale, 28, 105–147.
- Strobino, R. (2021). Avicenna’s Theory of Science. In Avicenna’s Theory of Science. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520969810
- Taftāzānī. (1996). Sharh al-Talwīḥ ʿalā al-Tawḍīh. Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah.
- Taşköprülüzâde. (2022). el-Livâü’l-Merfû‘ fî Hallî Mebâhisi’l-Mevzû: İlimlerde Konu, İlke ve Meseleler (E. Altaş, Ed.). İLEM Yayınları.
- Tekin, A. (2014). Aristoteles’in Analütika Hüstera (Kitâbu’l-Burhân) Adlı Eseri, Meşşâî Gelenekteki Yeri ve Üzerine Yazılan Şerhler. Iğdır Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3–4, 43–86.
- Tekin, K. (2022). The Conception of Science in Postclassical Islamic Thought (647–905/1250–1500): A Study of Debates in Commentaries and Glosses on the Prolegomenon of al-Kātibī’s Shamsiyya. Journal of Islamic Philosophy, 13, 83–123. https://doi.org/10.5840/islamicphil2022136