AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 13 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.68167
Cite this article
38
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

On the Nature of Practical Reason (Phronesis) in Aristotle

ESRA ÇAĞRI MUTLU1 Barış Mutlu2 Gökçe Yoğurtcu2
Show Less
1 Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu, Hukuk 15000, Burdur , Türkiye
2 Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü 54000, Bişkek , Kırgızistan
BIJP 2023, 13(3), 176–198; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.68167
Received: 5 July 2023 | Published online: 20 September 2023
© 2023 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Aristotle’s views of practical reasoning/wisdom (phronesis) are closely linked to his account of action (praxis). When it comes to practical reasoning, its relation with virtues, which are divided into two as intellectual and ethical virtues by Aristotle, is extremely important. To make this relation clearer, first, the connection of practical thinking with theoretical thinking and therefore with the intellectual virtues was questioned. For example, it has been tried to understand whether the rational deliberation in practical reasoning works like theoretical deliberation or whether it proceeds in a different way. In addition, the relation between the wish, desire and intuitive reason and the connection with the action of the person concerned were questioned through the major and minor premises of practical thinking. In this discussion, we will try to understand how practical reasoning takes place in Aristotle, in the context of the interpretations we will mention, that is, the way practical and theoretical thinking progresses, the premises and results they deal with, and their ends.

Keywords
Practical reasoning
major premise
minor premise
desire
action.
References
  1. Ackrill, J. L. (1981). Aristotle the Philosopher. Oxford: OUP.
  2. Allan, D. J. (1955). The Practical Syllogism. In Autor d’Aristote. Leuven: Publications Universitaries de Louvain.
  3. Aristoteles. (1951). Ikinci Analitikler. (H. R. Atademir, Çev.). İstanbul: MEB.
  4. Aristoteles. (1996). Metafizik. (A. Arslan, Çev.). İstanbul: Sosyal Yay.
  5. Aristoteles. (1997). Nikomakhos’a Etik. (S. Babür, Çev.). Ankara: Ayraç Yayınevi.
  6. Aristoteles. (2013). Hayvanların Hareketi Üzerine. (H. N. Beyaz Erkızan,). Bursa: Sentez Yay.
  7. Aristoteles. (2018). Ruh Üzerine (Ö. Aygün & Sev, Y. G, Çev.). İstanbul: Pinhan Yayıncılık.
  8. Balme, D. (1987). Aristotle’s use of division and differentiae. In Allan Gotthelf & James G. Lennox (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (69-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Cooper, J. (1975). Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  10. Furth, M. (1987). Aristotle’s biological universe: an overview. In Allan Gotthelf & James G. Lennox (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (21-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Hardie, W. F. R. (1968). Aristotle’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  12. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
  13. Nussbaum, M. C. (1985). Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  14. Peters, E. F. (2014). Antik Yunan Felsefesi Terimleri Sözlüğü (H. Hünler, Çev.ve Haz.). İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
  15. Ross, D. (2011). Aristoteles (A. Arslan, Çev.). İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
  16. Wiggins, D. (1980). Deliberation and Practical Reason. In Sameness and Substance (221-240). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing