AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 12 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1779
Cite this article
2
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The ‘Alienated’ Modern Man in John Galsworthy’s Short Fiction 

Ufuk Özen Baykent1
Show Less
1 Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Bölümü 16059, Bursa, TR
Received: 20 April 2021 | Published online: 10 February 2022
© 2022 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The present study aims to explore how living in a metropolis affects the lives of modern men as narrated in John Galsworthy’s short story entitled the Japanese Quince. The story explores the idea of customs standing as obstacles to one’s freedom and focuses on the solitary mood of men while they are missing the lust for life. Galsworthy’s characters who are dwellers of the metropolis are suffering from estrangement. They are aware of the joys and beauties in nature and in life that stand right next to them, yet they miss them while being too much engaged with the routines, habits and ‘musts’.  The present paper examines Galsworthy’s Londoner characters as representatives of modern man suffering from alienation, being aware of the disease yet making no move towards better. The exploration of the Londoner character, Mr Nilson who is the protagonist in the Japanese Quince will reveal the suffering of modern man from estrangement.

 

Keywords
John Galsworthy
alienation
short fiction
Japanese quince
modernity.
References
  1. Abercrombie, N. & Hill, S. & Turner, B. S. (2006). The Penguin Dictionary of SociologyLondon: Penguin Books.
  2. Bruce, S. & Yearley, S. (2006). The Sage Dictionary of Sociology. London: Sage Publications.
  3. Frechet, A. (1982). John Galsworthy: A Reassessment. (Trans. D. Mahaffey). London: The Macmillan Press.
  4. Hegel, G. W. F. 2001. The Philosophy of History. Translated by J. Sibree. Kichner: Batoche Books.
  5. Galsworthy, J. (1910).  A Motley. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  6. Gindin, J. (1987). John Galsworthy’s Life and Art. London: MacMillan.
  7. Longstaffe-Gowan, T. (2014). The London Square. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  8. Marx, K. (1959). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Trans. M. Milligan. Moscow: Progress Publishers
  9. Schalit, L. (1970). John Galsworthy: A Survey. New York: Haskell House Publishers.
  10. Smit, J. H. (1969). The Short Stories of John Galsworthy: A Critical Analysis. New York: Haskell House Publishers.
  11. The Nobel Prize in Literature 1932. NobelPrize.org. Nobel Media AB 2019. Fri. 1 Feb 2019. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1932/summary.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing