AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 11 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1654
Cite this article
14
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Problem of the Foundation of Obligations

Murat Bayram1
Show Less
1 Bingöl Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler MYO, Hukuk Bölümü 12000, Bingöl , Turkey
BIJP 2021, 11(2), 835–858; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1654
Received: 3 October 2020 | Published online: 29 June 2021
© 2021 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Do individuals only have real moral obligations within the legal framework? Does the legislator's imposition of certain requirements give citizens a practical reason to obey, as well as a moral reason? Does such a moral reason also apply to people who disapprove of the adopted law or who believe that this law is wrong in principle? If individuals have no such moral obligation, then the state's ability to use force falls seriously, perhaps entirely, into a vacuum. In addition, disobedience occurs in society. For this reason, the obligation to obey is deemed necessary in every society. In this study, we will discuss how obligations are founded and what is shown to be the reason for our obedience. However, we will consider whether we have an obligation to obey an unjust law. We will also argue that the obligation will have no moral basis to support political functions.

Keywords
Individual
political obligation
legal obligation
fair play
associative obligations.
References
  1. Arneson, R. J. (1982). “The Principle of Fairness and Free Rider Problems”. Ethics, 92(4), 616-633
  2. Bentham, J. (1977). A Comment on The Commentaries and A Fragment on Government. (J. Burns, & H. Hart,) London: Athlone Press.
  3. Brandt, R. (1964). The Concepts of Obligation and Duty. Mind(73), 374–93.
  4. Burke, E. (1866). Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs. Little Brown, 4, 164-167.
  5. Dworkin, R. (1998). Law's Empıre. Portland: Hart Publıshıng.
  6. Dagger, R. (1993). “Playing Fair with Punishment”. Ethics, 103(3), 473-488.
  7. Dagger, R. (1997). Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. New Jersey: Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  9. Gilbert, M. (2006). A Theory of Political Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint Commitment: How We Make The Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Green, T. H. (1999). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings. Canada: Batoche Books.
  12. Green, L. (2002). “Law and Obligations”. J. C. Shapiro(Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Hart, H. (1955). Are There Any Natural Rights? Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175-191.
  14. Hart, H. L. (1982). Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Hobbes, T. (2014). Levıathan. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  16. Hume, D. (1985). Essays Moral, Philosophical and Literary. E. F. Miller (Ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
  17. Hume, D. (2009). İnsan Doğası Üzerine Bir İnceleme. (Ç. E. Baylan, Çev.) Ankara: BilgeSu Yayıncılık.
  18. Klosko, G. (2004). The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. Lanham: Rowman.
  19. Klosko, G. (2005). Political Obligations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Klosko, G. (2011). “Are Political Obligations Content Independent?”. Political Theory, 39(4), 498-523.
  21. Kropotkin, P. A. (2015). Anarşi. (Çev. I. Ergüden). İstanbul: Kaos Yayınları.
  22. Nozick, R. (2015). Anarşi, Devlet ve Ütopya. (A. Oktay, Çev.) İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  23. Parekh, B. (1993). A Misconceived Discourse on Political Obligation. Political Studies(41), 236-251.
  24. Perry, S. (2004). “Assocıatıve Oblıgatıons and The Oblıgatıon To Obey The Law”. Conference on Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press.
  25. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  26. Rawls, J. (1969). “The Justification of Civil Disobedience”. American Political Science Association, (s. 176-189).
  27. Rawls, J. (1964). “Legal Obligations and the Duty of Fair Play”. S. Hook (Ed.).  Law and Philosoph (3-18). New York: New York University Press.
  28. Rawls, J. (2001). “Sivil İtaatsiziğin Tanımı ve Haklılığı”. Y. Coşar (Ed.). Kamu Vicdanına Çağrı Sivil İtaatsizlik (s. 55-78). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  29. Raz, J. (2006). “The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception”. Minnesota Law Review, (90), 1003-1044.
  30. Ross, W. (1930). The Right and The Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Simmons, A. J. (1996). Associative Political Obligations. Ethics, 106(2), 247-273.
  32. Simmons, A. J. (1979). “The Principle of Fair Play”. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(4), 307-337.
  33. Steinberger, P. (2004). The Idea of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Tamir, Y. (1993). Liberal Nationalism. NJ: Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  35. Wacks, R. (2016). Hukuk Kuramını Anlamak. (Çev. Ş. Ünver, S. Ünver, F. Süzgün). Ankara: Astana Yayınları.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing