AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 11 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1640
Cite this article
13
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Bultmann: Towards a Critical Theology

Selim Çörekçi1
Show Less
1 Hacettepe üniversitesi, SBE, Sosyoloji Programı 06800, Ankara , Turkey
BIJP 2021, 11(1), 449–472; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1640
Received: 15 August 2020 | Published online: 25 March 2021
© 2021 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Heidegger is concerned, in his writings on early Greek thinking, with the gradual deterioration of the understanding of aletheia in terms of logos, language, towards its understanding in terms of glossa, discourse or objectifying speech. This, for Heidegger, is a movement away from understanding, towards misunderstanding. It is this development that is at the heart of Bultmann’s interpretation of the ‘mythology’ which came, in his estimation, to surround humanity’s eschatological expectation. In other words, ‘language’ and ‘discourse’ in Heidegger’s writings mean the same as ‘language’ and ‘myth’ in Bultmann’s writings. When Heidegger moves beyond his transcendental analysis of Dasein in Being and Time, and bagins to speak of the event (Ereignis) of the ontological difference, he has a masive and lasting influence upon Bultmann’s understanding of the event (Ereignis) of God’s eschatological action in Jesus Christ, as the decisive moment of ontological importance for the individual.

Keywords
Revelation
aletheia
Bultmann
Heidegger
Heraclitus
hermeneutics.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing