AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 11 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1635
Cite this article
31
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Phenomenological Perception of Law Enforcement Praxis

Erdem Erciyes1
Show Less
1 Jandarma Genel Komutanlığı, Strateji ve Dış İlişkiler Başkanlığı 06560, Ankara , Turkey
BIJP 2021, 11(1), 187–197; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1635
Received: 9 August 2020 | Published online: 5 March 2021
© 2021 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This paper aims to develop the phenomenology of law enforcement praxis through a phenomenological interpretation of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology; Heidegger’s hermeneutical phenomenology; and Merleau-Ponty’s idea of perception. The main research question of this research is “What is the reality of law enforcement praxis?” Phenomenology provides a general comprehension of the experience by demonstrating the relationship between the mind and the world. The praxis of law enforcement is reflected in Husserl’s phenomenology as a transcendental act by subject in relation to the object. Heidegger’s phenomenology mostly being in the concept of “Dasein”, which is influenced by a link with time and history of law enforcement. Merleau-Ponty’s idea of perception sees being existing prior to the thought of law enforcement as an ‘inalienable presence.  Unlike Husserl; Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty perceive being as the inseparable part of the law enforcement organization itself and individual.

Keywords
Law enforcement management
phenomenology
transcendental phenomenology
hermeneutical phenomenology
idea of percepton.
References
  1. Carman, T. & Hanse, M. B. (Eds.) (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Giorgi, A. (2012). The Descriptive Phenomenological Psychological Method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43 (1), 3-12.
  3. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. (Trans.  J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson). New York: Harper.
  4. Heidegger, M. (1982). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. (Trans. A. Hofstadter). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  5. Heidegger, M. (1994). Basic Questions of Philosophy: Selected Problems of Logic. (Trans. R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  6. Howell, K. E (2004). Positivism, Phenomenology and Paradigms of Inquiry: Investigating the Foundations of Methodological Approaches. British Academy of Management. Harrogate: University of Leeds.
  7. Howell, K. E. (2013). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology. London: Sage Publications.
  8. Husserl, E. (1969). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. (Trans. W. R. Boyce Gibson). London: George Allen & Unwin.
  9. Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. (Trans. D. Carr). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  10. Husserl, E. (2003). An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. (Trans. C. Welch). New Brunswick: Ateost Press.
  11. Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, 1-29.
  12. McIntyre, R. & Smith, D. W. (1989). Theory of Intentionality. Husserl's Phenomenology: A Textbook. (Eds. J. N. Mohanty & W. R. McKenna). Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America, 147-179.
  13. Merlau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. (Trans. C. Smith). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  14. Merlau-Ponty, M. (1964). The Primary of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics. (Trans. W. Cobb). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  15. Moran, D. (2013). Edmund Husserl and Phenomenology. Philosophy of Minds: The Key Thinkers. (Ed. A. Bailey). London: Bloomsbury.
  16. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. California: Sage Publications.
  17. Nenon, T. (2013). A Fundamental Difference: Husserl and Heidegger on the Grounding of Ethics. Investigaciones Fenomenologicas, 4 (2), 191-211.
  18. Waldenfels, B. (1999). Merlau-Ponty. A Companion to Continental Philosophy. (Eds. S. Critchley & W. R. Schroeder). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing