AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 10 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1592
Cite this article
1
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dialectic as an Attitude in Adorno

Erdem Baykal1
Show Less
1 Independent Researcher of Philosophy 26170, Eskişehir, Turkey
BIJP 2020, 10(2), 581–605; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1592
Received: 6 April 2020 | Published online: 15 June 2020
© 2020 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

In this paper, we tried to understand Adorno’s negative dialectic in relation to Kant and Hegel. To do so, we have compared subject-object relation and the conception of experience in Adorno with Kant’s and Hegel’s idea of subject and experience. Apart from that, we have also strove to illuminate the historical context of Adorno’s negative dialectic in relation to Hegel’s phenomenology. As a result, Adorno’s dialectic, in a historical context, is not a system and method but an opponent attitude against the totalitarian ideology of modernism. Finally, it is possible to see Adornien philosophy very close to Kant much more than Hegel.

Keywords
Adorno
Hegel
Kant
İdealism
metaphysical experience
negative dialectic.
References
  1. Adorno, T. (1982). Trying to Understand Endgame. (Trad. M. T. Jones). New German Critique, 26, 119-150.
  2. Adorno, T. (2014). On Subject and Object. Subject and Object Frankfurt School Writings on Epistemology, Ontology, and Method. (Ed. R. Groffin). London & New York: Bloomsbury, 149-164.
  3. Adorno, T. (2005). Minima Moralia. (Çev. O. Koçak & A. Doğukan). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  4. Adorno, T. (2016). Negatif Diyalektik. (Çev. Ş. Öztürk).  İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. 
  5. Adorno, T. (2017). Metafizik, Kavram ve Sorunlar. (Çev. İ. Serin). İstanbul: İthaki Yayınevi.
  6. Behrens, R. (2011). Adorno Sözlüğü. (Çev. M. Tüzel). İstanbul: Versus Yayınevi.
  7. Bernstein, J. M. (2001). Adorno, Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Ferrarin, A. (2019). Thinking and the I, Hegel and the Critique of Kant. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  9. Hegel, G. W. F. (1996). Anahatlarda Felsefi Bilimler Ansiklopedisi 1: Mantık Bilimi. (Çev. A. Yardımlı). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
  10. Hegel, G. W. F. (2011). Tinin Görüngübilimi. (Çev. A. Yardımlı). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
  11. Hegel, G. W. F. (2014). Mantık Bilimi. (Çev. A. Yardımlı). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
  12. Joll, N. (2009). Adorno’s Negative Dialectic: Theme, Point, and Methodological
  13. Status. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 17 (2), 233-253.
  14. Kant, İ. (1993). Arı Usun Eleştirisi. (Çev. A. Yardımlı). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
  15. Nobre, M. (2004). Subjectivité et Objectivité Slon Kant et Hegel: Un Model Adornien de Critique et Métacritique. Les Études Philosophiques, 70, 311-329.
  16. O’Connor, B. (2004). Adorno’s Negative Dialectic Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  17. Pinkard. T. (2020). What Is Negative Dialectics? Adorno’s Reevaluation of Hegel. A Companion to Adorno. (Eds. P. E. Gordon & E. Hammer & M. Pensky). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 459-472.
  18. Winfield, R. D. (2012). Hegel’s Science of Logic: A Critical Rethinking in Thirty Lectures. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing