AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 9 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1539
Cite this article
37
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An Analysis of the Transition in Wittgenstein’s Philosophy: A Momentary Revolution or a Dialectical Result?

Musa Azak1 Yasin Parlar2
Show Less
1 İnönü Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 44000, Malatya , Turkey
2 Independent Researcher 44000, Malatya , Turkey
BIJP 2019, 9(4), 1031–1054; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1539
Received: 12 November 2019 | Published online: 6 December 2019
© 2019 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

In this study, we aim to offer a plausible explanation of the intellectual transition between the early and later periods Ludwig Wittgenstein. In the secondary literature, this shift is generally and commonly taken as a philosophical metamorphosis that took place as a result of many momentary inspirations or conversions. But in this paper, our main argument is that this shift is a result of a dialectical process, not a momentary metamorphosis. In this context, by focusing on Wittgenstein’s transition-period thoughts which are commonly ignored, we aim to discuss the reasons why the philosophical shift between his early and later thoughts took place by delving into the theoretical problems in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. And to achieve this aim, we will focus on the critical influence of Pierro Sraffa and Prank P. Ramsey on Wittgenstein, and we will also examine the problems of color propositions that led him to abandon his thoughts in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. We conclude that the shift in Wittgenstein’s philosophy was not a momentary metamorphosis; but a result of a dialectical process, which we interpret as progress of contrary thoughts confronting each other.

Keywords
Picture theory of meaning
color incompatibility
critical contributions
critical contributions
middle period.
References
  1. Engelmann, M. L. (2013). Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development: Phenomenology, Grammar, Method and Anthropological View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Fann, K. T. (1971). Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy. California: University of California Press.
  3. Glock, H.-J. (2005). Ramsey and Wittgenstein: Mutual Influences. F. P. Ramsey: Critical Reassessments. (Ed. M. Frapoli). London: Continuum Publishing, 41-70.
  4. Hacker, P. M. (1986). Insight and Illusion: Themes in The Philosophy of Wittgenstein. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Hartnack, J. (2006). Wittgenstein and Modern Philosophy. (Trabns. M. Kranston). London: Methuen & Co.
  6. Hintikka, J. (2015). Wittgenstein Üzerine. (Çev. F. Osman). İstanbul: Sentez Yayınları.
  7. Hume, D. (1999). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. (Ed. T. L. Beauchamp). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Jacquette, D. (1998). Wittgenstein’s Thought in Transition. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
  9. Malcolm, N. (2001). Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. McGuinnes, B. (2008). Wittgenstein in Cambridge Letters and Documents 1911-1951. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  11. Monk, R. (2005). Wittgenstein: Dahinin Görevi. (Çev. B. Kılınçer, & T. Er). İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
  12. Moore, G. E. (1955). Wittgenstein’s Lectures in 1930-1933. Mind, 253, 1-27.
  13. Pears, D. (1988). The False Prison: A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy, vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Ramsey, F. P. (1923). Critical Notices of Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. Mind, 128, 465-478.
  15. Ramsey, F. P. (1950). The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. Ed. (R. B. Braithwaite). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  16. Sayan, E. (2013). Renklerin Uzlaşmazlığı. Tutarsızlığın İz Sürücüsü: Dilde/Düşüncede Teo Grünberg'e Armağan. (Ed. Z. Kutlusoy). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi, 215-225.
  17. Sen, A. (2003). Sraffa, Wittgenstein, and Gramsci. The Journal of Economic Literature, XLI, 1240-1255.
  18. Sluga, H. (1996). Wittgenstein: Life and Work An Introduction. D. G. Hans Sluga içinde, The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. (Ed. H. Slugas). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-33.
  19. Soykan, Ö. N. (2006). Felsefe ve Dil: Wittgenstein Üstüne Bir Araştırma. İstanbul: MVT Yayıncılık.
  20. Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critic of Economic Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Waismann, F. (2003). Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann. (Trans. J. Schulte, & B. McGuinnes). London: Basil Blackwell Publishing.
  22. Wittgenstein, L. (1929). Some Remarks on Logical Form. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 9, 162-171.
  23. Wittgenstein, L. (1974b). Philosophical Grammar. (Trans. A. Kenny). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishing.
  24. Wittgenstein, L. (1974a). Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. (Trans. D. F. Pears). London: Kegan Paul.
  25. Wittgenstein, L. (2007). Remarks on Colour. (Trans. L. L. McAlister). California: University of California Press.
  26. Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. (Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe & P. M. Hacker, & J. Schulte). London: Blackwell Publishing.
  27. Wittgenstein, L. (2011). Mavi Kitap-Kahverengi Kitap. (Çev. D. Şahiner). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing