AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 9 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1498
Cite this article
23
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Comparison of F.C.S. Schiller and Necati Öner's Views on Freedom of Choice

Nihat Durmaz1
Show Less
1 Bartın Üniversitesi, İslami İlimler Fakültesi, Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Bölümü 74110, Bartın , Turkey
BIJP 2019, 9(4), 1139–1154; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1498
Received: 17 June 2019 | Published online: 20 October 2019
© 2019 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The problem of freedom, which is one of the most important subjects in the history of philosophy, is generally discussed through the responsibility of the human being. It can be said that this problem, which is handled with the freedom of choice and action, is more complex than it appears. This complex structure involves examining the reasons behind the choices made. As a result of such an examination, it has been concluded that there are three basic views on the problem of freedom: determinist, indeterminist and freedom of indifference. In this study, Schiller’s and Öner's critiques of determinism, indeterminism and freedom of indifference and their views on freedom of choice will be discussed.

Keywords
Schiller
Necati Öner
freedom
freedom of choice
determinism
indeterminism.
References
  1. Aristoteles (1971). Eudemian Ethics. (Trans. H. Rackham). Massachussetts: Harvard University Press.
  2. Hançerlioğlu, O. (1966). Özgürlük Düşüncesi. İstanbul: Varlık Yayınları.
  3. Mill, J. S. (2008). Özgürlük Üzerine. (Çev. T. Türk). İstanbul: Oda Yayınları.
  4. Öner, N. (1986).  Klasik Mantık. Ankara: AÜİF Yayınları.
  5. Öner, N. (2005a). Bilginin Serüveni. Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.
  6. Öner, N. (2005b). İnsan Hürriyeti. İstanbul: Hiperlink.  
  7. Öner, N. (2009). Görüşler. Ankara: Beyaz Kule Yayınları.
  8. Plato (2005). Meno and Other Dialogues. (Trans. R. Waterfield). New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Schiller, F. C. S. (1891). Riddles of the Sphinx. London: Swan, Sonnenschein, and Co.
  10. Schiller, F. C. S. (1907). Freedom and Responsibility. Oxford and Cambridge Review, 1 (2), 41-73.  
  11. Schiller, F. C. S. (1907). Studies in Humanism. London and New York: Macmillan.
  12. Schiller, F. C. S. (1912). Humanism: Philosophical Essays. London and New York: Macmillan.
  13. Schopenhauer, A. (2000). İstencin Özgürlüğü Üzerine. (Çev. M. Söyler). Ankara: Öteki Yayınevi.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing