AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 9 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1464
Cite this article
41
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Epistemological Reflection of the Ontic 'Time' Phenomenon

Esad Çetin1
Show Less
1 Independent Researcher of Philosophy 34480, İstanbul , Turkey
BIJP 2019, 9(3), 713–728; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1464
Received: 7 January 2019 | Published online: 10 July 2019
© 2019 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This paper focuses on the philosophical ground constituted between “Language” and “Logic”, which should be coined as “synthetic ways” because the synthesis of “Logic” and “Language” is  “the science of Logic”  as one of the synthetic ways of synthesis by the “mind”.  When we look into the historical development of this synthesis process, we see very different synthetic operations, compared with those which are in modern times and in terms of fundamental dynamics. Thus, this article aims to show that the dynamic of “time” is in interaction with the dynamic of “motion” –so the dynamic of “changing”.  It also aims to how that that the quality of the interaction between those dynamics is coming true because of the difference in understanding the category of “quantity” by the views of different philosophers. For instance, according to Aristotle, categories belong to being; but in Kant, categories belong to the mind that will perceive the being. Hence, this study aims to show the difference in understanding the “being” and the one who perceives it from a different perspective.

 

Keywords
Language
logic
time
being
motion.
References
  1. Akan, N. (2013). Platon'da Müzik. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
  2. Altınörs, A. (2016). 50 Soruda Dil Felsefesi. İstanbul: Bilim ve Gelecek Kitaplığı.
  3. Aristoteles. (2017). Fizik.(Çev. S. Babür). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  4. Aristotle. (1889). The Organon, or Logical Treatise of Aristotle with the Introduction of Phorphyry. (Trans. O. F. Owen). London: George Bell & Sons.
  5. Capek, M. (1976). The Concepts of Space and Time. Dordrecht: Springer.
  6. Croce, B. (1965). Aesthetic: As Science of Expression and General Linguistic. (Trans. D. Ainslie). Ne York: The Noonday Press.
  7. Çakmak, C. (1993). Platon'da Gerçekliği Tasvir Eden Önermelerin Yapısı Hakkında Bir Çalışma. Felsefe Arkivi, 30, 123-139.
  8. Deleuze, G. (2000). Kant Üzerine 4 Ders. (Çev. U. Baker). Ankara: Öteki Yayınevi.
  9. Dorato, M. (2002). Kant, Gödel and Relativity. 11th International Congress of the Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Synthese Library, 329-346..
  10. Frege, G. (2017). Aritmetiğin Temelleri. (Çev. B. Gözkan). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  11. Høffding, H. (1911). La Pensée Humaine. (Traduction Française par De Coussange). Paris: Alcan.
  12. Husserl, E. (1995). Kesin Bir Bilim olarak Felsefe. (Çev. T. Mengüşoğlu). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  13. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. (Trans. P. Guyer & A. W. Wood). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Kasa, I. (2015). Fregenin Platonculuk Argümanı. M. Bruce, & S. Barbone. Batı Felsefesindeki 100 Temel Mesele.(Çev. M. Topal). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 513-515.
  15. Klein, É. (2017). Maddenin Gizemleri. (Çev. A. N. Bingöl). İstanbul: BGST Yayınları.
  16. Koç, Y. (1984). Determinizm ve Mekan. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  17. Koç, Y. (2012). Matematiğin Ontolojisi Bakımından Kant ile Frege Karşılaştırması. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/iufad/issue/1309/15443.
  18. Le Poidevin, R., & MacBeath, M. (1993). The Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. McTaggart, J. (1927). The Nature of Existence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Naim, B. A. (2005). Bir Felsefe Dili Kurmak. (Çev. İ. Kara). Bir Felsefe Dili Kurmak. İstanbul: Dergah Yayınları.
  21. Öktem, Ü. (2005). Fenomenoloji ve Edmund Husserl'de Apaçıklık Problemi. DTCF Dergisi, 45 (1), 27-55.
  22. Öner, N. (2011). Klasik Mantık. Ankara: Divan Kitap.
  23. Özdemir, M. (2014). Kant’ta Aritmetiğin Sentetik A Prıori Olarak Olanaklılığının Matematik Felsefesi Açısından Önemi ve Matematik Eğitimine Yapabileceği Katkılar. (Dr. Tezi). İstanbul: Maltepe Üniversitesi SBE.
  24. Özlem, D. (2017). Mantık. İstanbul: Notos Yayınevi.
  25. Platon (2016). Sofist. (Çev. C. Karakaya). İstanbul: İletişim Yayıncılık.
  26. Reichenbach, H. (1957). The Philosophy of Space and Time. (Trans. M. Reichenbach & J. Freund). New York: Dover Publications.
  27. Rodych, V. (2007). Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/wittgenstein-mathematics.
  28. Weiner, J. (1997). Frege and the Linguistic. Philosophical Topics, 25, 265-288.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing