AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 9 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1468
Cite this article
34
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Can Thinking Overcome Evil? On Thinking in Hannah Arendt

Sengün Meltem Acar Keskin1
Show Less
1 AHBVÜ, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 06560, Ankara , Turkey
BIJP 2019, 9(1), 103–119; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1468
Received: 25 November 2018 | Published online: 6 March 2019
© 2019 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

By dealing with Hannah Arendt’s view on thinking, this paper aims to reveal the arguments on which Arendt has established the relationship between thinking and evil. The article, which is divided into two main sections, first examines the nature of thinking that Arendt refrains from defining. The difference between thinking and knowing, along with the question of why thinking is an activity; thus its distinction from contemplation in the traditional philosophy, constitute the main problems of this section. The second part of the article is on thinking as an internal, silent dialogue which according to Arendt is the only positive definition that can be made about it. For her, this way of thinking exemplified by Socrates and based on the duality that one has on his own, is important for reducing the possibility of one’s evildoing, even though it cannot prevent it completely. The study concludes by examining the reflections of thinking in action.

Keywords
Arendt
thinking
evil
banality of evil
thoughtlessness
Socratic dialogue.
References
  1. Arendt, H. (1971). Thinking and Moral Considerations. Social Research, 38 (3), 417-446.
  2. Arendt, H. (1981). The Life of the Mind. New York: Harvest.
  3. Arendt, H. (2003). İnsanlık Durumu. (Çev. B. S. Şener). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  4. Arendt, H. (2018a). Ahlak Felsefesinin Bazı Sorunları. Sorumluluk ve Yargı. (Ed. A. Birsen). İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık, 49-136.
  5. Arendt, H. (2018b). Zihnin Yaşamı. (Çev. İ. Ilgar). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  6. Berkowitz, R. (2010). Solitude and the Activity of Thinking. Thinking in Dark Times. (Eds. R. Berkowitz & J. Katz & T. Keenan). New York: Fordham University Press, 237-245.
  7. Bernstein, R. J. (2006). Arendt on Thinking. The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. (Ed. D. Villa). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 277-292.
  8. Camus, A. (1992). Sisyphos Söyleni. (Çev. T. Yücel). İstanbul: Adam Yayınları.
  9. Dolan, F. M. (2006). Arendt on Philosophy and Politics. The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. (Ed. D. Villa). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 261-276.
  10. Heidegger, M. (1968). What is Called Thinking? (Trans. F. D. Wieck & J. G. Gray). New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
  11. Kattago, S. (2014). Hannah Arendt on the World. Hannah Arendt Key Concepts. (Ed. P. Hayden). London & New York: Routledge, 52-65.
  12. Mcgowan, J. (1997). Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  13. Young-Bruehl, E. (1982). Reflections on Hannah Arendt’s the Life of the Mind. Political Theory, 10 (2), 277-305.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing