AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 5 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/bijop.88140
Cite this article
25
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Epistemological Diversity in Social Science Graduate Curriculum: The Experience from an American College in Czech Republic

Pelin Ayan Musil1
Show Less
1 Anglo-American University in Prague School of International Relations and Diplomacy Department of Politics Letenska 5, 11800, Prague , CZ
BIJP 2015, 5(1), 47–57; https://doi.org/10.18491/bijop.88140
Received: 16 April 2015 | Published online: 12 June 2015
© 2015 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The insufficient coverage of philosophy of science and epistemological discussion in graduate curriculum has been a subject of criticism among several scholars. In this article, I examine the ways through which the MA curriculum in International Relations in an American college in Czech Republic was restructured toward a meaningful representation of different epistemological approaches. The restructuration of the program comes as a result of the university’s search for legitimacy in a post-communist society. Similar to its peers in Central and Eastern Europe, the university is enforced to increase its quality in teaching. It does so through introducing participatory curriculum committees where faculty members from different epistemological backgrounds gather. The experience shows that such participatory mechanisms in universities are essential to give space for philosophy of science debates in graduate curriculum.

Keywords
Epistemology
philosophy of science
social sciences
international relations
graduate curriculum.
References
  1. Galbraith, K. (2003). Towards Quality Private Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 28 (4), 539-559.
  2. Mayer, L. (2002). The Centrality of Epistemology in Methodology Education. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35 (1), 121-125.
  3. Pachuashvili, M. (2007). Legitimacy Sources and Private Growth in the Post-Communist Context. Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe in Search for Legitimacy (eds. S. Slantcheva & D. C. Levy). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 75-94.
  4. Reisz, R. D. (2003). Public Policy for Private Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe. Conceptual Clarifications, Statistical Evidence, Open Questions. HoF Arbeitsbericht. Wittenberg: Institute for Higher Education Research at the Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg.
  5. Slantcheva, S. (2007). Legitimating the Difference: Private Higher Education Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe in Search for Legitimacy (eds. S. Slantcheva & D. C. Levy). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 55-74.
  6. Schwartz-Shea, P. (2003). Is This the Curriculum We Want? Doctoral Requirements and Offerings in Methods and Methodology. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36 (3), 379-386.
  7. Weber, M. 1946 [1922]. Science as Vocation. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (eds. H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills). New York: Oxford University Press, 129-156.
  8. Wenninger, A. (2010). Social Sciences in Central and Eastern Europe: Institutonal Landscapes. Internationalization of Social Sciences in Central and Eastern Europe (eds. I. P. Kov & I. Palne & D. Kutsar). New York: Routledge, 85-98.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing