AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 16 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.87506
Submit to BIJP
Cite this article
1
Download
12
Views
Related Info Links
Google Scholar
More by Authors Links
Emine Göçer
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Interpretation of Skeptical Fideism as a Religious Fictionalist Discourse in Early Modern Philosophy 

Emine Göçer1 ,  Nilüfer Öztürk Kocabıyık1
Show Less
1 Çukurova Üniversitesi, İlahiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Bölümü 01330, Adana, Türkiye
BIJP 2026, 16(1), 87–110; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.87506
Received: 29 September 2025 | Published online: 10 March 2026
© 2026 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
XML
Cite
Abstract

This study investigates skeptical fideism in early modern philosophy by analyzing its historical origins, epistemic foundations, and connection to religious fictionalism. Emerging from the revived Pyrrhonian debates, particularly the “Pyrrhonian crisis” and the “problem of the criterion of truth,” skeptical fideism articulated a systematic opposition between reason and faith, reinforced through skeptical arguments. Within early modern Catholic thought, this approach gained particular significance as a strategy to defend faith in the face of rational critique. Key figures such as Erasmus, Montaigne, and Bayle contended that the mysteries of faith resist rational comprehension yet remain defensible through a skeptical stance. Since rational justification inevitably leads to further skepticism, they argued, reason must be bracketed in matters of faith. Accordingly, faith isn’t construed as justified belief but as a pragmatic commitment fostering communal harmony. By situating this perspective in dialogue with religious fictionalism, the article illuminates the historical, epistemic, and semantic dimensions of skeptical fideism.

Keywords
Philosophy of religion
early modern philosophy
skepticism
Fideism
religious fictionalism.
References
  1. Alston, W. (1996). Belief, Acceptance, and Religious Faith. İçinde J. Jordon & D. Howard-Snyder (Ed.), Faith, Freedom, and Rationality (ss. 3-27). Rowman & Littlefield.
  2. Arslan, A. (2008). İlkçağ Felsefe tarihi 4: Helenistik Dönem Felsefesi, Epikurosçular, Stoacılar, Septikler. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
  3. Audi, R. (2011). Rationality and Religious Commitment. Oxford University Press.
  4. Bayle, P. (1963). The Great Contest of Faith and Reason (K. sandberg, Çev.). Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.
  5. Bayle, P. (1965). Historical and Critical Dictionary (R. Popkin & C. Brush, Çev.). The Bobbs Merrill Company.
  6. Berkeley, G. (2019). Complete Works,. Delphi Classics.
  7. Bıyık, M. (2005). Katolik Tiranlığından Protestan Teokrasisine John Calvin ve Cenevre Modeli. Dini Araştırmalar, 8(22), 41-62. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/da/issue/4459/61473
  8. Bishop, J. (2007). Believing by Faith: An Essay in the Epistemology and Ethics of Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
  9. Bogdanovski, M. (2006). Skeptical Fideism in Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Theoria, 49(4), 71-92. https://doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?id=0351-22740604071B
  10. Brock, S. (2020). Religious Fictionalism and Pascal’s Wager. İçinde B. Armour-Garb & F. Kroon (Ed.), Fictionalism in Philosophy (ss. 207-237). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190689605.003.0011
  11. Buchak, L. (2012). Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? İçinde J. Chandler & V. S. Harrison (Ed.), Probability in The Philosophy of Religion (ss. 225-246). Oxford University Press.
  12. Burke, P. (2003). Montaigne (C. Atila, Çev.). Altın Kitaplar Yayınevi.
  13. Cardoso, S. (2010). On Skeptical Fideism in Montaigne’s Apology for Raymond Sebond. İçinde Neto (Ed.), Skepticism in the Modern Age (ss. 71-82). Brill.
  14. Cevizci, A. (2009). Felsefe Tarihi,. Say Yayınları.
  15. Chisholm, R. M. (1973). The Problem of the Criterion. https://philpapers.org/rec/CHITPO-12
  16. Cordry, B. S. (2010). A critique of religious fictionalism. Religious Studies, 46(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412509990291
  17. Courtenay, W. J. (1975). Nominalism and Late Medieval Religion. İçinde C. Trinkaus (Ed.), The Pursuit of Holiness in Late Medieval and Renaissance Religion (ss. 26-66). Brill. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/edcollchap/book/9789004477414/B9789004477414_s006.pdf
  18. Cowling, S., & Giberman, D. (2025). Nominalism in Metaphysics. http://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/nominalism-metaphysics/
  19. Çil, A. (2012). Martin Luther’in İman ve Vahiy Anlayışı. Eskiyeni, (25), 115-120. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eskiyeni/issue/37051/426395
  20. Dionysius, P. (1987). Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works (C. Luibhéid & P. Rorem, Çev.). Paulist Press.
  21. Eklund, M. (2024). Fictionalism. İçinde E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/fictionalism/
  22. Erasmus, D. (1964). Handbook of the Militant Christian (J. Dolan, Çev.). İçinde The Essentail Erasmus. Meridian.
  23. Erasmus, D. (2002). Discourse on Free Will: Erasmus-Luther (E. Winter, Ed. & Çev.). Continuum.
  24. Erdem, E. (2016). Varlıktan Tanrı’ya: İbn Sînâ’nın Metafizik Delili. Endülüs Yayınları.
  25. Gorham, G. (1997). Early Modern Philosophical Theology in Great Britain. İçinde C. Taliaferro & P. Quinn (Ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion (ss. 124-132). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320152.ch13
  26. Göçer, E. (2021). Doksastik Olmayan İman Modeli, İnanç ve Şüphe. Dicle İlahiyat Dergisi, 6-20.
  27. Göçer, E. (2022). Batı Düşüncesinde Şüphecilik ve Fideizm. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  28. Hanson, D. J. (1993). Fideism and Hume’s Philosophy. Peter Lang.
  29. Hickson, M. W., & Lennon, T. M. (2014). The Rise of Religious Skepticism in the Seventeenth Century. İçinde D. Kaufman (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Seventeenth Century Philosophy (ss. 563-582). Routledge.
  30. Hoopes, R. (1951). Fideism and Skepticism During the Renaissance: Three Major Witnesses. The Huntington Library Quarterly, 14(4), 319-347. https://doi.org/10.2307/3816548
  31. Howard-Snyder, D. (2013). Propositional faith: What it is and what it is not. American Philosophical Quarterly, 50(4), 357-372.
  32. James, E. D. (1962). Scepticism and Fideism in Bayle’s Dictionnaire. French Studies, 16(4), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/XVI.4.307
  33. Joyce, R. (2023). Introduction: Fictionalism- Moral, Religious, Hermeneutic, Revolutionary. İçinde R. Joyce & S. Brock (Ed.), Moral Fictionalism and Religious Fictionalism. Oxford University Press.
  34. Kenny, A. (2017). Batı Felsefesinin Yeni Tarihi: Modern Felsefe’nin Yükselişi (V. Uzundağ, Çev.; 1. bs, C. 3). Küre Yayınları.
  35. Kroon, F. (2018). A Critical Introduction to Fictionalism (S. Brock & A. J. McKeown-Green, Ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
  36. Kvanvig, J. L. (2013). Affective Theism and People of Faith. Midwest Studies In Philosophy (Wiley-Blackwell), 37(1), 109-128. (90469351). https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12003
  37. Liggins. (2021). Fictionalism. Oxford Bibliographies. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0034.xml
  38. Luther, M. (1823). De Servo Arbitrio or The Bondage of the Will (H. Cole, Çev.). Christian Classics Eternal Library. https://ccel.org/ccel/luther/bondage/bondage.
  39. Luther, M. (1957). That These Words of Christ ‘This is My Body,’ etc., Still Stand Firm Against the Fanatics. İçinde H. T. Lehmann (Ed.), Luther’s Works (C. 37). Fortress Press.
  40. Machuca, D. E. (2024). Skeptical Theism, Fideism, and Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Bollettino Della Società Filosofica Italiana, 242(2), 7-29.
  41. Malcolm, F. (2018). Can Fictionalists Have Faith? Religious Studies, 54(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412517000063
  42. Matytsin, A. M. (2007). Skepticism and Belief in Early-Modern France: The Fideism of Bishop Pierre-Daniel Huet. University of Pennsylvania.
  43. McCain, K. (2014). Problem of the Criterion. İçinde Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/problem-of-the-criterion/
  44. McKaughan, D. J. (2013). Authentic Faith and Acknowledged Risk: Dissolving the Problem of Faith and Reason. Religious Studies, 49(1), 101-124. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/authentic-faith-and-acknowledged-risk-dissolving-the-problem-of-faith-and-reason/765CEBE9C75B8365021E683A1E0E5504
  45. Montaigne, M. D. (2011). Denemeler (E. Sunar, Çev.; C. 2). Say Yayınları.
  46. O’Brien, J. (2019). Pyrrhonism. İçinde J. Jennings & M. Moriarty (Ed.), The Cambridge History of French Thought (ss. 62-66). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316681572.007
  47. Oppy, G. (2023). Religious Fictionalism. İçinde R. Joyce & S. Brock (Ed.), Moral Fictionalism and Religious Fictionalism (s. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198881865.003.0006
  48. Penelhum, T. (1983). God and Skepticism: A Study in Skepticism and Fideism. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  49. Perler, D. (2004). Was There a Pyrrhonian Crisis in Early Modern Philosophy? A Critical Notice of Richard H. Popkin. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 86(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.2004.009
  50. Popkin, R. (1960). The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Descartes. Van Gorcum.
  51. Popkin, R. (1993a). Introduction: Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. İçinde R. Popkin & A. Vanderjagt (Ed.), Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246867_002
  52. Popkin, R. (1993b). Scepticism and Modernity. İçinde T. Sorell (Ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy: The Tension Between the New and Traditional Philosophies from Maciavelli to Leibniz (ss. 15-32). Clerandon Press.
  53. Popkin, R. (2003). The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford University Press.
  54. Pritchard, D. (2021). Quasi-Fideism and Sceptical Fideism. Manuscrito, 44(4), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n4.dp
  55. Reçber, M. S. (2013). Akıl ve İman. Din Felsefesi, 175-223.
  56. Rummel, E., & MacPhail, E. (2024). Desiderius Erasmus. İçinde The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/erasmus/
  57. Scott, M. (2023). Religious Fictionalism: Strategies and Obstacles. İçinde R. Joyce & S. Brock (Ed.), Moral Fictionalism and Religious Fictionalism. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/55708/chapter-abstract/434111773?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  58. The Holy Bible. (2017). Holmen Bible Publishers. https://csbible.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CSB_Pew_Bible_2nd_Printing.pdf
  59. Vázquez, M. (2015). The Skepticism of Michel de Montaigne. Springer International Publishing.
  60. Woleński, J. (2004). The History of Epistemology. İçinde I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen, & J. Woleński (Ed.), Handbook of Epistemology (ss. 3-54). Springer Netherlands.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept