AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 15 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.87128
Cite this article
3
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

At the Limits of What Can Be Said: The Philosophy Established and Destroyed by the Tractatus

TAYFUN TORUN1
Show Less
1 Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 16059, Bursa, Türkiye
BIJP 2025, 15(4), 1335–1356; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.87128
Received: 3 September 2025 | Published online: 29 December 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

In this article, Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus is examined as both the founding and critical threshold of the tradition of analytical philosophy, with the aim of elucidating not only its definitional ambiguities but also its internal tensions. While the linguistic analysis, logical priority, anti-psychologism, and metaphysical opposition that characterize analytical philosophy are discussed in their historical and conceptual diversity, the Tractatus is shown to be the most rigid formulation of these tendencies. However, this rigidity is also the basis for dissolution: Wittgenstein's language, which confines meaning solely to the factual realm, limits philosophy to silence. Thus, while the Tractatus crystallizes the analytic tradition within the precise boundaries of language, it simultaneously condemns it to its own silence. In this sense, the text represents not merely a beginning but a radical critique that undermines the very foundations of analytic philosophy.

Keywords
Wittgenstein
analytic philosophy
Tractatus
limits of language
limits of philosophy.
References
  1. Altuğ, T. (1989). Modern Felsefede Metafiziğin Elenmesi ve Yol Açtığı Bilgikuramsal Sorunlar. Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  2. Ayer, A. J. (1984). Dil, Doğruluk ve Mantık (V. Hacıkadiroğlu, Çev.). Metis Yayınları.
  3. Ben-Menahem, Y. (2002). Psychologism and Meaning. İçinde A. Biletzki & A. Matar (Ed.), The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes (ss. 123-138). Routledge.
  4. Flor, J. R. (2000). Der junge Wittgenstein: Sprache und logische Form – Das Evangelium der Redlichkeit: Das Sagbare und das Unsagbare. İçinde A. Hügli & P. Lübcke (Ed.), Philosophie im 20. Jahrhundert: Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytische Philosophie (C. 2, ss. 131-156). Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
  5. Frege, G. (1893). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik: C. I. Verlag von Hermann Pohle.
  6. Glock, H.-. J. (2004). Was Wittgenstein an Analytic Philosopher? Metaphilosophy, 35(4), 419-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00329
  7. Güven, Ö. (2015). Analitik Felsefenin Tanımlayıcı Özellikleri Üstüne. Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları, 28, 11-24.
  8. Hacker, P. M. S. (2002). Analytic Philosophy: What, whence, and whither? İçinde A. Biletzki & A. Matar (Ed.), The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes (ss. 3-34). Routledge.
  9. Hanna, R. A. (2017). Wittgenstein and Kantianism. İçinde H.-. J. Glock & J. Hynman (Ed.), A Companion to Wittgenstein (ss. 682-698). Wiley-Blackwell.
  10. Hylton, P. (2002). Analysis in Analytic Philosophy. İçinde A. Biletzki & A. Matar (Ed.), The Story of Analytic Philosophy: Plot and Heroes (ss. 37-55). Routledge.
  11. Irzık, G. (1992). Wittgenstein ve Carnap: Tractatus’un Mantıkçı Pozitivizme Etkisi. Felsefe Tartışmaları, 11, 59-81.
  12. Kusch, M. (2024). Psychologism. İçinde E. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/psychologism
  13. Magee, B. (2000). Büyük Filozoflar: Platon’dan Wittgenstein’a Batı Felsefesi (A. Cevizci, Çev.). Paradigma Yayınları.
  14. Magge, B. (1985). Wittgenstein’ın Çifte Felsefesi: A. Quinton ile Söyleşi (O. Aruoba, Çev.). İçinde M. Tuncay (Ed.), Yeni Düşün Adamları (ss. 105-126). Birey ve Toplum Yayınları.
  15. Rossi, J.-G. (2000). Analitik Felsefe (A. Altınörs, Çev.). Paradigma Yayınları.
  16. Russell, B. (1959). My Philosophical Development. Routledge.
  17. Ryle, G. (2011). Zihin Kavramı (S. Çelik, Çev.). Doruk Yayınları.
  18. Ryle, G. (2022). Ludwig Wittgenstein (B. Baran & C. Kurtoğlu, Çev.). Bitig Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(3), 174-182.
  19. Soykan, Ö. N. (2006). Wittgenstein felsefesi: Temel Kavram ve Sorunlar. Cogito, 33, 40-78.
  20. Stevens, G. (2013). Analytic Philosophy as Philosophy. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 2(2), 28-34.
  21. Tümkaya, S. (2020). Analitik Felsefe Diye Bir Felsefe Okulu Var Mıdır? Felsefe Dünyası, 72, 290-309.
  22. Wittgenstein, L. (2002). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (O. Aruoba, Çev.). Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  23. Wuchterl, K. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein: Sprachanalyse und Therapie. İçinde M. Fleischer (Ed.), Philosophen des 20. Jahrhunderts: Eine Einführung (ss. 41-58). Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing