Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
News and Announcements
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The Educational Role of Aristotelian Rhetoric in Developing Critical Thinking
Show Less
1 Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 49250, Muş,
Türkiye
Received: 19 April 2025 | Published online: 27 September 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract
Aristotelian rhetoric holds a significant place in modern education in terms of intellectual originality and mental development. From Ancient Greece to the present, rhetoric has served not only as a means of effective communication but also as a tool for organizing thoughts, expressing ideas, and addressing opposing views. As such, it remained central to education systems until the late 19th century. For Aristotle, rhetoric is not merely the art of persuasion but a process of cultivating thought. In education, it is considered a powerful tool for developing both creative thinking and critical perspectives. In today’s world of easy access to information, rhetoric has become even more essential for fostering critical thinking. This study explores the historical roots and modern applications of Aristotelian rhetoric—particularly its three core elements: ethos, pathos, logos—and examines how it supports creative and critical thinking, with a focus on its ongoing relevance in contemporary education.
Keywords
Logic
rhetoric
Aristotle
education
critical thinking.
References
- Adeodato, J. M. (1999). The Rhetorical Syllogism (Enthymeme) in Judicial Argumentation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 12(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008998121097
- Aristoteles. (1987). Poetika (İ. Tunalı, Çev.). Remzi Kitapevi.
- Aristoteles. (1995). Retorik (M. H. Doğan, Çev.). Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
- Aristoteles. (1996). Organon V: Topikler (H. R. Atademir, Çev.). Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
- Aristoteles. (1998). Birinci Çözümlemeler (A. Houshıary, Çev.). Dost Kitapevi.
- Aristoteles. (2015). İkinci Çözümlemeler (A. Houshıary, Çev.). Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
- Aristoteles. (2017). Politika (F. Akderin, Çev.). Say Yayınları.
- Baba, C. (2019). Retorik ve Mantık İlişkisi. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9, 247-260. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.639740
- Blair, J. A. (2004). The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments. In C. A. Hill & M. H. Helmers (Eds.), Defining Visual Rhetorics (pp. 41–61). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_19
- Carey, C. (1994). Artless Proofs in Aristotle and the Orators. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 39, 95–106.
- Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor (2nd ed.). Macmillan Education/Palgrave.
- Demirdöğen, Ü. D. (2010). The Roots of Research in (political) Persuasion: Ethos, Pathos, Logos and the Yale Studies of Persuasive Communications. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 3(1), 189–201.
- Dewey, J. (2022). Nasıl Düşünürüz? Fol Kitap.
- Duffy, W. (2023). What Is Rhetoric? A “Choose Your Own Adventure” Primer. In T. Daniels-Lerberg, D. Driscoll, M. K. Stewart, & M. Vetter (Eds.), Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing (Vol. 5, pp. 247–267). Parlor Press.
- Durhan, G. (2021). Eleştirel Düşünme: Bir Sokratik Sorgulama Metodolojisi. Temaşa Felsefe Dergisi 15, 86-97.
- Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2007). Aristotle’s Art of Rhetoric. In I. Worthington (Ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric (pp. 107–123). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997161.ch9
- Ijesseling, S. (1977). Rhetoric and Philosophy in Conflict. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1037-5
- Ismail, E. (2020). Developing Critical Thinking with Rhetorical Pedagogy. OSSA 12: Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity, 1–12.
- Karaboğa, M. T. (2019). Bilgi Toplumunda Eleştirel Düşünme Eğitiminin Önemi ve Gerekliliğine İlişkin Bir Çalışma. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 8(3), 37-49.
- Kennedy, G. A. (1963). The Art of Persuation in Greece. Princeton University Press.
- Korshunova, A. A., Bastrikova, E. M., Zharkynbekova, S. K., Urazayeva, K. B., & Abylkhassova, K. S. (2019). Formation of rhetorical skills in school: mental features and active teaching methods. 3C TIC: Cuadernos de Desarrollo Aplicados a Las TIC, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctic.2019.83-2.180-193
- Morgan, T. (2007). Rhetoric and Education. In I. Worthington (Ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. (pp. 303–319). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997161
- Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). University of Notre Dame Press.
- Saki, M. (2016). Rhetoric and critical thinking. Deeds and Days, 66, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.66.4
- Şahinel, S. (2002). Eleştirel Düşünme. Pegem Yayınları.
- Triantari, S. (2012). Rhetoric of Aristotle in “Lifelong education". Lambert Academic Publishing (LAP).
- Triantari, S. A. (2014a). The aesthetic dimension of rhetoric according to Friedrich Nietzsche and implications in education. Menon: Journal of Educational Research, 3, 105–112.
- Triantari, S. A. (2014b). The communicational mask of the globalized rhetoric: The modern interpretation of Aristotle’s “not invedit and “invedit proofs. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 2(2), 253–258.
- Triantari, Sotiria. A., & Noitsis, I. (2015). Aristotelian Rhetoric As Tool Of Development Of Critical Thinking In Education. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 2(9), 1592–1598. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v2i9.08
- Yeşil, M. (2024). Eleştirel Düşünme Öğrenimi Üzerine Bir Uygulama: Sokrates’in Savunması. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, 8(1), 115-136.