AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 15 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.82577
Cite this article
3
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Emergence of the Problem of Metaphysics in Kant

İLYAS ALTUNER1
Show Less
1 Iğdır Üniversitesi, İlahiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Bölümü 76000, Iğdır, Türkiye
BIJP 2025, 15(2), 673–686; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.82577
Received: 16 May 2025 | Published online: 29 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Kant’s criticisms of metaphysical research are not, of course, a pure criticism of metaphysics; they also show to what extent the theses of metaphysics can be verified by reason. In this sense, we believe that Kant’s aim was not to abolish metaphysics per se, even though the test of the fictional metaphysics that Kant calls transcendental dialectics with knowledge is shown to have failed by Kant. In fact, Kant’s analyses ultimately refer to different versions of classical philosophy, which Kant himself does not deny. This article aims to analyze Kant’s criticisms of metaphysics in a systematic way and to show why his views on metaphysics are the way they are. It will be the central hypothesis of this article that Kant's views on the impossibility of a science of metaphysics are to be found in the distinction between transcendental analytic and dialectic.

Keywords
Kant
metaphysics
transcendental philosophy
dialectics
experience
pure reason
judgment.
References
  1. Allison, H. E. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Yale University Press.
  2. Altuğ, T. (2004). Modern Felsefede Metafiziğin Elenmesi. Etik Yayınları.
  3. Aristotle. (1924). Aristotelous Ta Meta ta Physika: Aristotle’s Metaphysics (W. D. Ross Ed.). Clarendon Press.
  4. Buroker, J. V. (2006). Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Heidegger, M. (1965). Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (J. S. Churchill, Trans.). Indiana University Press.
  6. Hume, D. (1995). An Inquiry Concerning Human Undertanding (C. W. Hendel, Ed.). Prentice Hall.
  7. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
  8. Kant, I. (2002a). Critique of Practical Reason (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.
  9. Kant, I. (2002b). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (A. W. Wood, Trans.). Yale University Press.
  10. Kant, I. (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics (G. Hatfield, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
  11. Leibniz, G. W. (1992a). Discourse on Metaphysics (G. R. Montgomery, Trans.). Prometheus Books.
  12. Leibniz, G. W. (1992b). The Monadology (G. R. Montgomery, Trans.). Prometheus Books.
  13. Locke, J. (1974). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (A. D. Woozley, Ed.). Meridian Book.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing