AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 14 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.77747
Cite this article
3
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

George Berkeley’s Reading of Plato 

Ayşe Gül Çıvgın1
Show Less
1 Bartın Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 74100, Bartın, Türkiye
BIJP 2024, 14(3), 639–660; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.77747
Received: 5 August 2024 | Published online: 23 September 2024
© 2024 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This article aims to trace Plato’s thought in Berkeley’s idealism, which emerges from the statement “to be is to be perceived.” In doing so, rather than comparing the views of both thinkers, the focus will be on how Berkeley reads Plato. In this context, it is aimed to present a general presentation of Berkeley’s system of thought, on the one hand, abstract ideas and criticism of materialism, and on the other hand, to determine whether Berkeley’s writing style, especially in the form of dialogue, and his idealism are in contact with Plato’s ideas. In conclusion, a general, though not exhaustive, evaluation of the literature on the connection between Berkeley’s and Plato’s views will be made, and an attempt will be made to answer the question ‘Berkeley’s Plato or Platonism?’ and ‘What would Plato have said if he had read Berkeley?’

Keywords
Berkeley
Plato
idea
idealism
materialism.
References
  1. Berkeley, G. (1953). The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, Vol. V. Siris, Three Letters to Thomas Prior, Letter to Rev. Dr. Hales, Farther Thoughts on Tar-water, Varia (A. A. Luce & T. E. Jessop, Ed.). Nelson.
  2. Berkeley, G. (1993). Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher: In Focus (D. Berman, Ed.). Routledge.
  3. Berkeley, G. (1996). İnsan Bilgisinin İlkeleri Üzerine (H. Turan, Çev.). Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
  4. Berkeley, G. (2008). Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. George Berkeley Philosophical Writings (D. M. Clarke, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  5. Berkeley, G. (2013). İnsan Bilgisinin İlkeleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme. (L. Özşar, Çev.). Biblos kitabevi.
  6. Bracken, H. M. (1985). Realism and Greek philosophy: What Berkeley saw and Burnyeat missed. George Berkeley: Essays and Replies, 63-80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23040856
  7. Bradatan, C. (2006). The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment. Fordham University.
  8. Burnyeat, M. (1982). Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed. The Philosophical Review, 91(1), 3-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184667
  9. Cassirer, E. (1957). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: C. Three: The Phenomenology Of Knowledge (R. Manhaim, Çev.). Yale University Press.
  10. Copleston, F. (1998). Felsefe Tarihi Berkeley & Hume (A. Yardımlı, Çev.). İdea Yayınevi.
  11. Elmas, M. F. (2021). Tanrı’nın Doğa’yla ve Doğa’nın Tanrı’yla Kuşatılması: Mevzi Savaşında Spinoza ve Berkeley’in Kritik Müdahaleleri Üzerine Bir Derinleşme. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 11(3), 1157-1189.
  12. Gedikli, M. E. (2022). Platon’un Realist ve Anti-Realist Yorumları. Yeni Yayınları.
  13. Guyer, P., & Horstmann, R. P. (2023). “Idealism” (E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman, Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/idealism/>
  14. Jessop, T. E. (1953). Editor’s Introduction. Siris: A Chain of Philosophical Reflexions and Inquiries Concerning the Virtues of Tar-Water, and Divers Other Subjects Connected Together and Arising One from Another. (A. A. Luce & T. E. Jessop, Ed.; ss. 8-23). Nelson.
  15. Locke, J. (2007). İnsanın Anlama Yetisi Üzerine Bir Deneme. (M. D. Topçu, Çev.). Öteki Yayınevi.
  16. Michaud, D. A. (2021). Christian Platonism in Early Modernity (A. J. B. Hampton & J. P. Kenney, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  17. Mill, J. S. (1978). Berkeley’s Life and Writings (1871). University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul. İçinde J. W. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Philosophy and the Classics by John Stuart Mill (Collected Works).: C. XI. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  18. Peters, F. E. (2004). Aporia (H. Hünler, Çev.). İçinde Antik Yunan Felsefesi Terimleri Sözlüğü. Paradigma Yayınları.
  19. Platon. (2000). Sofist (C. Karakaya, Çev.). Sosyal Yayınları.
  20. Platon. (2007). Menon (A. Cevizci, Çev.). Sentez.
  21. Rickless, S. C. (2013). Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism. Oxford University Press.
  22. Thonnard, F. J. (1956). A Short History of Philosophy (E. A. Mariarz, Çev.). Desclee & Cie.
  23. Van Iten, R. J. (1964). Berkeley’s Analysis of Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (International Phenomenological Society), 24(3), 375-382. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2104813
  24. Wenz, P. (1976). Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 37(3), 537-546. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2708814
  25. Woolhouse, R. S. (2019). Ampirist Filozoflar (G. Murteza, Çev.). Pinhan Yayıncılık.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing