AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 14 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.75289
Submit to BIJP
Cite this article
4
Views
Related Info Links
Google Scholar
More by Authors Links
Osman Bayraktutan
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Contributions of Philosophical Thought to the Science of Recitation

Osman Bayraktutan1
Show Less
1 Atatürk Üniversitesi, İlahiyat Fakültesi, Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü 25030, Erzurum, Türkiye
BIJP 2024, 14(2), 509–523; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.75289
Received: 15 February 2024 | Published online: 23 June 2024
© 2024 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
XML
Cite
Abstract

This article explores the influence of philosophical thought on the Science of Recitation, focusing on its impact on methodology, interpretation, and analytical depth. It argues that foundational philosophical concepts, especially ontology, epistemology, and axiology, substantially enhance the interpretive capacity in this discipline. The philosophy of language plays a crucial role in ensuring accurate understanding and interpretation of essential texts. Beyond methodological advancements, philosophical discourse provides a solid theoretical framework for the detailed examination of textual structures and meanings. By integrating critical thinking and ontological insights, the Science of Recitation achieves a deeper level of textual analysis, uncovering layered meanings. The interaction between the Science of Recitation and philosophical themes, particularly through the lenses of language philosophy and ontology, establishes a comprehensive scaffold for understanding terminology and advancing text evaluations. Consequently, philosophical thought significantly enriches the theoretical foundation of the Science of Recitation, facilitating elevated levels of understanding, interpretation, and scholarly analysis within an expansive intellectual arena.

Keywords
Recitation science
philosophical thought
ontology
philosophy of language
textual analysis.
References
  1. Adams, W. (2019). The structure of philosophical revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  2. Ahmed, S. (2018). Understanding Quranic Arabic: Principles of tafsir. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).
  3. Akyol, A. (2011). İbn Haldun’un İlim Anlayışında Felsefe ve Tarih Tasavvuru. Hitit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(20), Article 20.
  4. Alkayiş, A. (2017). Dil Ve Zihin Üzerine Felsefi Bir Değerlendirme.
  5. Altuner, I. (2011). Beyânî ve Burhânî Epistemolojilerin Yöntem Tartışmaları Açısından İncelenmesi. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 1, 89-103.
  6. Altuner, I. (2019). Descartes felsefesine giriş. Hiperlink eğit.ilet.yay.san.tic.ve ltd.sti.
  7. Arslan, A. (t.y.). İbn Haldun’un İlim ve Fikir Dünyası. 2006.
  8. Audi, R. (2010). Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Routledge.
  9. Bayraktutan, O. (2018). Kırâatlerde tevâtür olgusu. Gece Akademi.
  10. Bayraktutan, O. (2019). Kırâatlerde âhâd kavramı -Kavramın otantik anlamının tespitine dair-. Gece Akademi.
  11. Bayraktutan, O. (2023). Kırâatlerde müdrec kavramı- Kavramın kırâatlerde kullanılıp kullanılmamasının mantığına dair. Sonçağ Yayınları.
  12. Brown, J. (2017). Philosophical foundations of physics. Princeton University Press.
  13. Brown, J. A. C. (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The challenge and choices of interpreting the Prophet’s legacy. Oneworld Publications.
  14. Büyükdüvenci, S. (1983). Eğitim Felsefesi Tanımlar—İşlevler—Sorunlar. Eğitim ve Bilim, 7(41). http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/5741
  15. Clark, M. (t.y.). Islamic studies as a discipline: Conceptual reflections. Religion Compass, 6(2), 113-122.
  16. Çağlayan, H. (2014). Rasyonalizm Bağlamında Dilbilim Ve Din Dili İlişkisi. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 58, 41-58.
  17. Çelebi̇, V. (2014). Gündelik Dil Felsefesi ve Austin’in Söz Edimleri Kuramı. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18491/bijop.43006
  18. Çeti̇n, Y. (2023). Felsefi Metin Metodu Olarak Diyalog Üzerine. Antakiyat, 6(1), Article 1.
  19. Çivgin, A. (2014). Ontolojik Temellere Dayanan Felsefi Antropoloji. Mavi Atlas, 3, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18795/ma.30745
  20. Dağ, M. (2013). Kıraat İlminin Akademik Serencamı-Araştırma Mantığı ve Biçimi Üzerine. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 56, Article 56.
  21. Dânî, E.A.O.B.S. (1997). El-Ahrufu’s-seb‘a li’l-Kur’ân. Dâru’l-Menâra.
  22. Davis, M. (2016). The philosophy of mathematics. Routledge.
  23. Demir, A. (t.y.). The role of language philosophy in Qur’anic studies. Journal of Islamic Studies, 20(3), 345-362.
  24. Dohman, Ü. (2022). Kuramsal yönleriyle bilişsel dilbilim. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(43), 1235-1259.
  25. Evans, M. (2018). Philosophical psychology: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.
  26. Garcia, M. (2004). Kıraat. In R. C. Martin (Ed.). İçinde Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim world. Macmillan Reference USA.
  27. Gündüz, M. (2015). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press.
  28. Harris, P. (2016). Introduction to moral philosophy. Oxford University Press.
  29. İbn Cezerî. (ts.). An-Nashr fī qirā’āt al-’ashr. Dâru’l-Kutubi’l-‘İlmiyye.
  30. İbn Haldun. (1997). Mukaddime. MEB Yay.,.
  31. Jones, D. (2015). A comprehensive introduction. Oxford University Press.
  32. Kantar, N. (2023). On Artificial Intelligence Epistemology with Contemporary Epistemologist Robert Audi. Felsefe Dünyası, 78, Article 78. https://doi.org/10.58634/felsefedunyasi.1384113
  33. Kayapınar, A. (2006). İbn Haldûn’un Asabiyet Kavramı: Siyaset Teorisinde Yeni Bir Açılım. 15, 83-114.
  34. Lewis, D. (2019). Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press.
  35. Lycan, W. G. (2018). Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.
  36. Mekkî b. Ebî Tâlib. (1404). El-Keşf ‘an vücûhi’l-kırââti’s-seb’a ve ‘ilelihâ ve hicecihâ. Müessesetü’r-Risâle.
  37. Mekkî b. Ebî Tâlib. (1405). Müşkilu i‘râbi’l-Kur’an. Müessesetü’r-Risâle.
  38. Mekkî b. Ebî Tâlib. (ts.). El-İbâne ‘an me‘âni’l-kırâât. Müessesetü’r-Risâle.
  39. Miller, D. L. (2013). Metin analizi: Bir yöntem. İdil. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, 13(1), 66-80.
  40. Moore, G. (2017). Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press.
  41. Nerimanoğlu, K. V. (2015). Dil (bilimi) ve felsefe. Turkish Studies, 10(8), 103-140.
  42. Nutku, U. (2006). Felsefenin Temel Disiplini: Ontoloji. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, Article 1.
  43. Ömer Türker & Kübra Şenel, eds.,. (2020). Istanbul Journal of Arabic Studies » Submission » Ömer Türker & Kübra Şenel, eds., İslâm Dilbilim Geleneğinde Anlam Teorileri, İstanbul: Endülüs Yayınları, 2020, 245 p/s.
  44. Özdemir, H. (2018). The relationship between Hadith sciences and Islamic philosophy. Journal of Islamic Philosophy, 5(1), 56-72.
  45. Öztürk, F. (2014). Epistemology Of Counterfactuals And Experience. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17, Article 17.
  46. Parker, S. (2017). Introduction to ethics. Oxford University Press.
  47. Parlar. Y. (2015). Bilginin İmkânı ve Temelci Görüş. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Cilt 4, Sayı 2, 2015, s. 189-200, 4(2), 189-200.
  48. Peker, H., & Eyüpoğlu, O. (2015). Birey ve Toplum Açısından Din Eğitimine Duyulan İhtiyaç. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 0(37), 5. h
  49. Richardson, P., Mueller, C. M., & Pihlaja, S. (2021). Cognitive Linguistics and religious language: An introduction. Routledge.
  50. Smith, M. (2010). Introduction to philosophy. Routledge.
  51. Smith, M. U. (2010). Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: I. Philosophical/Epistemological Issues. Science & Education, 19(6), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9215-5
  52. Taylor, M. C. (2010). Philosophy and the patience of being. In R. Pasnau (Ed. The Cambridge history of medieval philosophy, 733-750.
  53. Ukberî,. (1416). El-Lübâb fî ʿileli’l-binâi ve’l-iʿrâb. Dâru’l-Fikr.
  54. Yakuboğlu, K. (1996). Osmanlı Medrese Eğitimi Ve Felsefesi [Ph.D.].
  55. Zemahşerî,. (1407). El-Keşşâf an hakâiki gavâmidi’t-tenzîl ve uyûni’l-ekâvîl fî vücûhi’t- te’vîl. Dâru’l-Kitâbi’l- ‘Arabiyyi.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept