AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 13 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.29228/beytulhikme.72002
Cite this article
29
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A New Discipline in Contemporary Philosophy: The Philosophy of Information

NESİBE KANTAR1
Show Less
1 Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 40100, Kırşehir , Türkiye
BIJP 2023, 13(3), 158–175; https://doi.org/10.29228/beytulhikme.72002
Received: 22 August 2023 | Published online: 28 September 2023
© 2023 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Scientific, technological and economic revolutions are important turning points in human history. The revolutionary impact has given new content and forms to individual, social and economic actions and occurrences. Sometimes it threatened the existence of the traditional, and sometimes it intervened in the sphere of existence by changing its nature. With the developments in science and computational technologies in the 20th century, the information revolution has exposed humanity to an unprecedented impact. This revolution has led to radical changes, transformations and innovations that are not only related to technology but also affect the whole of human life. This situation raised the question of what is the context of humans with informatics and how it is reflected in human life. All these problematic developments and effects have led to the emergence of a new philosophical discipline in our age.This is the Philosophy of Information. The article is about the philosophy of information, which we classify within the contemporary philosophy, dealing with the concepts and debates of the members of the informational world in ontological, epistemological and axiological contexts such as cybernetic systems, computers, intelligent systems, computational technologies and artificial intelligence. With these motives, the general definition of the Philosophy of Information, the general framework of the discipline is revealed by including the technical and scientific foundations on which it is based, the philosophical origins and the issues of the informatics philosophy respectively.

Keywords
The philosophy of information
artificial intelligence
cybernetics
technology
contemporary philosophy.
References
  1. Kesgin, A. (2019). Endüstriyel Siyaset ve Ahlak, Maarif Mektepleri Yayınları.
  2. Mirowski, & Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine dreams: economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge University Press.
  3. TDK (1988). Türkçe Sözlük, Yeni Baskı, Cilt 1 A-J, Ankara, Atatürk Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu.
  4. Adriaans, P. (2020). Information. İçinde E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/information/ (Erişim: 27 temmuz 2023)
  5. Beavers, A. F. (2016). A Brief Introduction To The Philosophy Of Information. Logeion: Filosofia Da Informação, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2016v3n1.p16-28
  6. Burnett, R. & Marshall, D. (2003) Web Theory An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
  7. Bynum, T.W., Moor, J.H. (1998). How computers are changing philosophy. In: (Ed T.W. Bynum and J.H. Moor) . The digital phoenix: How computers are changing philosophy. 1st ed. Oxford, USA Blackwell Publishers.
  8. Bynum, T. W. (2009). Milestones in the History of Information and Computer Ethics. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. (ed. Himma, K. E. and H. T. Tavani). New Jersey: Wiley, Hoboken, 25-48.
  9. Bynum, T. W. & Moor, J. H. (1998). The Digital Phoenix: How Computers Are Changing Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
  10. Bynum, T.W. (2000). A Very Short History of Computer Ethics.” APA Newsletters on Philosophy and Computers 99, no. 2 (Spring).
  11. Bynum, TW. (2010). Philosophy in the Information age. Metaphilosophy, 41(3): 420-442.
  12. Cantoni, L. & Tardini, S.(2006). Internet, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group Press
  13. Kahn, C. H. (1996). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Floridi, L. (2002). What is the Philosophy of Information? Metaphilosophy, 33(1-2), 123-145.
  15. Floridi, L. (2014). Artificial Agents and Their Moral Nature. İçinde P. Kroes (Ed.), The moral status of technical artefacts (ss. 185-212).
  16. Gobbo, F., Iliadis, A., Fresco, N., Kerr, E., Primiero, G., Allo, P., Vakarelov, O., Grubaugh, C., Schulz, C., & Turilli, M. (2013). Philosophy of Information: An Introduction. Society for the Philosophy of Information. https://www.academia.edu/5206129/Philosophy_of_Information_An_Introduction
  17. Johnson, D.(2001) Computer Ethics. 3th Ed. U.S.A.: Perentice Hall, Inc
  18. Kantar, N. (2022) Bilişim Felsefesinde Etik Arayışlar: Gelişim Etiği. Aktif Düşünce Yayıncılık
  19. Kantar, N. (2023). Teknoloji ve Etik: Gelişim Etiği Yaklaşımı. İçinde: Teknoloki,Etik Din (Ed. V. Ünverdi ve Arkadaşları) Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi Yayınları (219-244)
  20. Moor, H. J. (1995). What is Computer Ethics? In: Computer Ethics & Social Values. (Ed. Jhonson, Deborah & Nissenbaum,Helen). A simon & Schuster Company
  21. Wiener, N. (1988) Human Use of Human Beings, De Capo Press
  22. Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society (2d ed. rev.). Doubleday.
  23. Wiener, N. (2013). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Second edition, Cambride, Massachusetts: M.I.T Press.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing