Memory, which takes its object from history as well as experience, is a special possibility that shapes human actions in line with a purpose and forms self-consciousness. In this aspect, changes in the social, cultural, scientific and intellectual spheres affect the memory of the human being, who is claimed to be a moral being, which establishes his/her relationship and belonging to the place where he/she lives and to others. As a matter of fact, as a criticism of the current developments, it is necessary to emphasize the integrity of the human being, who is being transformed, in a way to remain on an ontological ground and to constantly emphasize that he is a moral being. In this context, as a suggestion, Sarıoğlu's moral attitude, which he tries to defend by taking into account the ontological foundations of existence, both includes a constitutive analysis of human memory and is an answer to the orientation of man in the shaping of today. Therefore, in this study, the holistic structure of the human being, which is the subject of Sarıoğlu's criticism on the ontological-moral ground, which he forgets or tries to make him forget in his search for the beginning of his own existence as a subject (super/ior/human), and his evaluations on both entrustment, being-together, and the use of reason with a moral content are discussed.