AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 12 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.29288/beytulhikme.65728
Cite this article
1
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Being Unconsciously Conscious

Sinem Elkatip Hatipoğlu1
Show Less
1 Marmara Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 34722, İstanbul, Turkey
BIJP 2022, 12(4), 1023–1039; https://doi.org/10.29288/beytulhikme.65728
Received: 15 August 2022 | Published online: 28 December 2022
© 2022 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

First-order theories of consciousness and higher-order theories of consciousness are rivals in the studies of consciousness and provide different explanations concerning the consciousness of a mental state. First-order theories defend that it is not possible to be unconsciously conscious whereas higher-order theories argue that it is possible. In this paper, I discuss these differences to see if there is indeed a deep disagreement or if the disagreement is merely a verbal dispute and thereby see if the two theories can be reconciled. In doing so, I also explain what it means to be unconsciously conscious granted that it is possible.

Keywords
Consciousness
conscious states of mind
theories of consciousness
Rosenthal
Dretske.
References
  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1980). The Nature of Mind and Other Essays. Cornell University Press.
  2. Byrne, A. (1997). Some Like It HOT: Consciousness and Higher-Order Thoughts. Philosophical Studies, 86(2), 103-129.
  3. Carruthers, P. (2000). Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Carruthers, P. (2005). Consciousness: Essays from a Higher-Order Perspective. Oxford University Press.
  5. Dretske, F. (1993). Conscious Experience. Mind, 102(406), 263-283.
  6. Dretske, F. (1995). Naturalizing The Mind. MIT Press.
  7. Dretske, F. (2007). What Change Blindness Teaches About Consciousness. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 215-230.
  8. Gennaro, R. J. (1996). Consciousness and Self-Consciousness. John Benjamins Publishing.
  9. Gennaro, R. J. (Ed.). (2004). Higher Order Theories of Consciousness: An Anthology. John Benjamins Publishing.
  10. Gennaro, R. J. (2012). The Consciousness Paradox: Consciousness, Concepts, and Higher-Order Thoughts. MIT Press.
  11. Kriegel, U. (2003). Consciousness as Intransitive Self-Consciousness: Two Views and an Argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 33, 103-132.
  12. Levine, J. (2001). Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Conscious Experience. MIT Press.
  13. Lycan, W. (1987). Consciousness. MIT Press.
  14. Lycan, W. (1996). Consciousness and Experience. MIT Press.
  15. Mandik, P. (2009). Beware of the Unicorn: Consciousness as Being Represented and Other Things That Don’t Exist. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(1), 5-36.
  16. Neander, K. (1998). The Division of Phenomenal Labor: A Problem for Representational Theories of Consciousness. Nous, 32(S12), 411-434.
  17. Rosenthal, D. (2002). Explaining Consciousness. In D. Chalmers (Ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings (ss. 406-421). Oxford University Press.
  18. Rosenthal, D. (2005). Consciousness and Mind. Oxford University Press.
  19. Rosenthal, D. (2011). Awareness and Identification of Self. In J. L. Liu & J. Perry (Ed.), Consciousness and The Self: New Essays (ss. 22-50). Cambridge University Press.
  20. Tye, M. (1995). Ten Problems of Consciousness. MIT Press.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing