AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 12 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.29288/beytulhikme.65716
Cite this article
1
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Considerations on Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: A Critical and Hermeneutic Analysis 

Abdulhan Ünlüsoy1
Show Less
1 İnönü Üniversitesi, İlahiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Bölümü 44280, Malatya, Turkey
BIJP 2022, 12(4), 1099–1118; https://doi.org/10.29288/beytulhikme.65716
Received: 15 April 2022 | Published online: 31 December 2022
© 2022 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study tries to contextualize the contemporary philosophy of religion through a metaphilosophical assessment of contemporary trends in philosophy. While doing this the following questions are basically taken into consideration. Should philosophy be appraised as just a rational attitude in terms of its essence? or is philosophy a way of perceiving presence, a way of giving meaning to it, having an existential aspect? Throughout this study while looking for answers to these questions, and determining our manner of philosophizing, we will start out from the similarities, differences originalities between the two great philosophical traditions of today’s philosophy, the continental european philosophy and the analytical philosophy. The similarities, differences and originalities between these two philosophical traditions will be attempted as manners of subjects, methods and approaches. While doing this various definitions of philosophizing and different meanings attributed to philosophy will be taken into consideration. The main features of philosophical effort will be determined by revealing the difference between these two great traditions. On the basis of acquired results contemporary styles of philosophy of religion will be evaluated in terms of these traditions. Eventually, based on deficiencies or inadequacies in the contemporary philosophy of religion, settings and recommendations will be arranged by considering the acquired results about how the contemporary philosophy should be.

 

Keywords
Philosophy
philosophy of religion
continental philosophy
analytic philosophy
metaphilosophy.
References
  1. Crockett, C. (2018). Derrida, Lacan, and Object-Oriented Ontology: Philosophy of Religion at the End of the World. Içinde Derrida after the End of Writing:Political Theology and New Materialism (ss. 74-92). Fordham University Press.
  2. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2020). Felsefe Nedir? (T. Ilgaz, Çev.; 13. bs). Yapı Kredi Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
  3. Giddens, A. (2018). Modernliğin Sonuçları (E. Kuşdil, Çev.; 8. bs). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  4. Glock, H.-J. (2008). What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.
  5. Griffin, D. R. (1989). God and Religion in the Postmodern World: Essays in Postmodern Theology. State University of New York Press.
  6. Gschwandtner, C. M. (2013). Postmodern Apologetics?: Arguments for God in Contemporary Philosophy (1. bs). Fordham University Press.
  7. Güngör, F. Ş. (2019). Felsefenin Sonu Mu Yeni Bir Adımı Mı? Badiou’nun Heidegger Eleştirisine Dair Bir Değerlendirme. Turkish Studies, 14(2), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.14842
  8. John D., C. (2006). Philosophy and Theology (1. bs). Abingdon Press.
  9. Knepper, T. D. (2013). The Ends of Philosophy of Religion: Terminus and Telos. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers Limited.
  10. Nietzsche, F. (2006). Ecce Homo: Kişi Nasıl Kendisi Olur (C. Alkor, Çev.; 2. Basım). İthaki Yayınları.
  11. Özcan, Z. (2017). Din Felsefesinin Felsefesi. Içinde R. Alpyağıl (Ed.), Gelen-eksel ve Çağdaş Metinlerle Din Felsefesine Dair Okumalar-1- (ss. 51-89). İz Yayıncılık.
  12. Plant, B. (2013). Wittgenstein, Religious “Passion” and Fundamentalism. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 41(2), 280-309.
  13. Tokat, L. (2021). Fenomenolojik Din Felsefesi Nedir? Din ve Felsefe Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(7), 33-58.
  14. Trakakis, N. (2008). The End of Philosophy of Religion. Continuum International Publishing Group.
  15. Tüzer, A. (2016). Postmodernizm ve Tanrı’nın Ölümü: Öznenin Arkeolojisi Üzerine Bir Deneme. Milel ve Nihal, 12(2), 73-124.
  16. Williams, J. R. (2005). Heidegger’in Din Felsefesi (M. Türkeri, Çev.; 1. bs). İzmir İlahiyat Vakfı Yayınları.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing