AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 12 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.29288/beytulhikme.65688
Cite this article
1
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Hans Vaihinger’s Fictionalism: The Philosophy of As If

Bahtinur Möngü1
Show Less
1 Erzurum Teknik Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 25050, Erzurum, Turkey
BIJP 2022, 12(4), 963–980; https://doi.org/10.29288/beytulhikme.65688
Received: 26 January 2022 | Published online: 21 December 2022
© 2022 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and analyze the views of Hans Vaihinger who defines philosophy as a rational, abstract and methodical treatment of reality or human existence and experiences, through his work called ‘The Philosophy of As If’, written in 1876. The work was written to show the central importance of fiction in forming opinions and decisions about our various daily or scientific activities, therefore the main subject of the work is fiction. Fictions are not only something on which human cognition is based but also everything necessary for satisfactory explanations of life and the world is based on fiction. For this reason, even if they do not have any basis in reality, fictions are the most important tools that human beings use to rationalize the irrational world, as Vaihinger states.

Keywords
Hans Vaihinger
fiction
contradiction
as if
intuition.
References
  1. Appiah, K. A. (2017). As If: Idealization And Ideals. Harvard University Press.
  2. Descartes, R. (2007). Felsefenin İlkeleri (Çev.: Mesut Akın). Say Yayınları.
  3. Ewijk, P. Van. (2010). “Life Must Be Led in the Dark Hans Vaihinger’s The Philosophy of “As If”’ in William Gaddis’s The Recognitions.” Orbis Litterarum, 65:5, 372–387.
  4. Faivre, A. (2000). Theosophy, Imagination, Tradition: Studies in Western Esotericism (T. by Chiristine Rhone). Published by State University of New York Press, Albany.
  5. Fine, A. (1993). “Fictionalism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1993.tb00254.x
  6. Frohschammer, J. (1877). Die Phantasie als Grundprincip des Weltprocesses. T. Ackermann.
  7. Kesici, H. (2010). Adam Smith ve Ahlâk Teorisi. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 58, 89–97.
  8. Podnieks, K. (2019). Correcting Vaihinger' s Fault Intended as part of the paper: Philosophy of Modeling in 1870s: a Tribute to Hans Vaihinger. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331113857_Correcting_Vaihinger’s_Fault.
  9. Pollard, S. (2010). “As If Reasoning in Vaihinger and Pasch”. Erkenntnis, 73(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-009-9205-7
  10. Pringe, H. (2011). “The Fiction of The Affecting Object in Hans Vaihinger’ s Philosophy.” Studi Kantiani, 24, 105–118.2020 (Erişim Tarihi). "Some Reflections on Hans Vaihinger". https://thejudoka.com/application/files /7615/5147/0948/as_if_vaihinger_and_brunton.pdf. (n.d.),
  11. Toteff, C. A. (1996). “Hans Vaihinger’s Kant-Studien.” In Kant-Studien 87. Jahrg., © Walter de Gruyter 1996 (pp. 390–395). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0745-7_85
  12. Vaihinger, H. (1935). The Philosophy of As If:a System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind (T. by C. K. Ogden (ed.); Second Edi). Kegan Paul and Co., Ltd.; New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315011134
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing