AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 11 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1700
Cite this article
43
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of Individuals’ Interactions on Social Media within the Context of Artificial Intelligence and Its Critique in terms of Nagel’s Approach to Problem of Other Minds

Vedat Çelebi1 Sait Can Ataman2
Show Less
1 Erciyes Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 38030, Kayseri , Turkey
2 Erciyes Üniversitesi, SBE, Felsefe Programı 38030, Kayseri , Turkey
BIJP 2021, 11(2), 567–588; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1700
Received: 29 January 2021 | Published online: 10 May 2021
© 2021 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Artificial intelligence studies emerge as one of the most important issues in the fields of computer and informatics. One of the important problems of the philosophy of mind is the problem of "other minds" which we will evaluate within the framework of artificial intelligence studies. It is seen that the subjective character of the conscious experience determines the basis of the problem of other minds. The question “How do we know that a person and non-human creatures have a mind or are conscious,” is the main question of the problem of other minds. This problem has been addressed based on our social relations with the outside world and people so far. In this direction, the purpose of the article is to critique this problem through social media, which is the socialization media and space of today's society. In conclusion, in the article, it is aimed to examine the existence of individuals on social media within the framework of artificial intelligence and with reference to the argument of the subjective character of conscious experience that Nagel put forward regarding the problem of "other minds".

Keywords
Nagel
artificial intelligence
other minds
individual
consciousness
social media.
References
  1. Adalı, E. (2017). Yapay Zekâ. İnsanlaşan Makineler ve Yapay Zekâ. (Haz. M. Karaca). İstanbul: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Vakfı Yayınları, 8-13.
  2. Ayas, M. (2018). Yapay Zekâ - İnsandan Öte. Thinktech Araştırma Raporu, Ocak 2018. STM Teknolojik Düşünme Merkezi. https://thinktech.stm.com.tr/uploads/raporlar/pdf/232201818557919_stm_yapayzeka_insandanote_.pdf.
  3. Baudrillard, J. (1995). Kötülüğün Şeffaflığı: Aşırı Fenomenler Üzerine Bir Deneme. (Çev. E. Abora & I. Ergüden). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  4. Baudrillard, J. (2011). Simülakrlar ve Simülasyon. (Çev. O. Adanır). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  5. Chun, W. H. K. (2015). Crisis, Crisis, Crisis; or, The Temporality of Networks. The Nonhuman Turn. (Ed. R. Grusin). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 139-166.
  6. Çelebi, V. & İnal A. (2019). Yapay Zekâ Bağlamında Etik Problemi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 66, 651-661.
  7. Çelebi, V. (2015). Zihinsel Süreçlerin Fiziksel Olarak Açıklanma Süreci ve Fizikalizm Eleştirisi. Felsefe Dünyası, 61, 127-152.
  8. Çelebi, V. (2019). Searle ve Nagel’in Bilinç Kuramlarında Fizikalizm Eleştirisi Bağlamında Yapay Zekânın Sınırı Tartışması. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Phlosophy, 9 (2), 351-376.
  9. Çelebi, V. (2020). Thomas Nagel’in Bilinç Kuramından Hareketle Diğer Zihinlerin Bilgisine Doğrudan Erişim Probleminin Değerlendirilmesi. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 29, 353-368.
  10. Dartmouth (1956). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Coined at Dartmouth. Erişim: 03.05.2021. https://250.dartmouth.edu/highlights/artificial-intelligence-ai-coined-dartmouth.
  11. Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
  12. Gödelek, K. (2013). Zihin Felsefesi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  13. Gunkel, D. J. (2012). Communication and Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges for the 21st Century. Communication +1, 1 (1), 1-25.
  14. Ifrah, G. (2002). Bilgisayar Ne Sayar: Rakamların Evrensel Tarihi IX. (Çev. K. Dinçer). Ankara: Tübitak Yayınları.
  15. Kuçuradi, İ. (2020). İnsan İlişkilerini Becermek Mars'a Gitmekten Zor. Erişim: 12.02.2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ7soJHTZ9g.
  16. Nagel, T. (1974). What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review, 83 (4), 435-450.
  17. Nagel, T. (2004). Her Şey Ne Anlama Geliyor: Felsefeye Küçük Bir Giriş. (Çev. H. Gündoğdu). İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
  18. Peter, J. & Kühne, R. (2018). The New Frontier in Communication Research: Why We Should Study Social Robots. Media and Communication, 6 (3), 73-76.
  19. Qi, J. & Monod, E. & Fang B. & Deng, S. (2018). Theories of Social Media: Philosophical Foundations. Engineering, 4 (1), 94-102.
  20. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 49, 433-460.
  21. Warburton, N. (2019). Felsefeye Giriş. (Çev. K. Cankoçak & M. A. Arslan). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
  22. Zhao, S. (2006). Humanoid Social Robots as a Medium of CommunicationNew Media Society, 8 (3), 401-419.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing