AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 11 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1595
Cite this article
37
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Peer Disagreement and the Independence Principle

Faik Kurtulmuş1
Show Less
1 Sabancı Üniversitesi, Sanat ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi Bölümü 34956, İstanbul , Turkey
BIJP 2021, 11(2), 507–520; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1595
Received: 15 June 2020 | Published online: 27 June 2021
© 2021 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This paper argues that the proper epistemic response to peer disagreement should depend, in part, on our grounds for judging the other person to be an epistemic peer. In particular, it argues that we can violate David Christensen’s Independence principle if (a) our judgment that another person is an epistemic peer can only be established by track record judgments from the ground level, or (b) we put less trust in the reasons we relied on in judging the other person to be an epistemic peer than the reasons we relied on in arriving at the judgment that is the subject of our disagreement.

Keywords
Peer disagreement
independence principle
conciliationism
epistemic self-trust.
References
  1. Alston, W. P. (1993). The Reliability of Sense Perception. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  2. Christensen, D. (2007). Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News. The Philosophical Review, 116 (2), 187-217.
  3. Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and Disagreement. Noûs, 41 (3), 478-502.
  4. Enoch, D. (2010). Not Just a Truthometer: Taking Oneself Seriously (But Not Too Seriously) in Cases of Peer Disagreement. Mind, 476, 953-997.
  5. Foley, R. (2001). Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Kelly, T. (2005). The Epistemic Significance of  Disagreement. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, vol. 1. (Eds. T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 167-196.
  7. Kelly, T. (2011). Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence. Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. (Eds. A. I. Goldman & D. Whitcomb). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183-217.
  8. Kitcher, P. (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Lackey, J. (2010). A Justificationist View of Disagreement’s Epistemic Significance. Social Epistemology. (Eds. A. Haddock, A. Millar, & D. Pritchard). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298-325.
  10. Zagzebski, L. T. (2012). Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing