AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 11 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1648
Cite this article
11
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Relationship between Self and Time in Grounding of Metaphysics: An Analysis with Reference to Kant and Heidegger

Sibel Kiraz1
Show Less
1 Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 45140, Manisa , Turkey
BIJP 2021, 11(1), 403–417; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1648
Received: 15 September 2020 | Published online: 30 March 2021
© 2021 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Heidegger interpreted Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, in an effort to ground metaphysics. This study aims to analyze the relationship between self and time as the key point of that interpretation with reference to Kant and Heidegger. Unlike Kant, Heidegger focuses on and awards significance to the concept of time in order to attain ontological knowledge. By doing so, the philosopher pushes the boundary that Kant draws between knowable and unknowable. In order to reveal how Heidegger achieves that, one should first shed light on how self and time relate to the concepts of transcendency, infiniteness, finiteness, thinking and self-consciousness. This article, which also aims to interpret the said relationality, consequently, holds that Heidegger, reduces the distance between humans and reality through his attempt to ground metaphysics.

Keywords
Heidegger
Kant
metaphysics
self
time
thinking
self-consciousness.
References
  1. Aristoteles. (2001). Fizik. (Çev. S. Babür). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  2. Descartes, R. (1983). Felsefenin İlkeleri. (Çev. M. Akın). İstanbul: Say Yayınları.  
  3. Draaisma, D. (2012). Yaşlandıkça Hayat Neden Çabuk Geçer. (Çev. G. Koca). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  4. Gözkan, B. (2010). Kant’tan Heidegger’e Varlığın Anlamı Meselesi. Cogito, 64, 133-152.
  5. Gözkan, B. (2018). Kant’ın Şemsiyesi: Kant’ın Teorik Felsefesi Üzerine Yazılar. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  6. Heidegger, M. (1997a). Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. (Trans. R. Tarft). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  7. Heidegger, M. (1997b). Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. (Trans. P. Emad & K. Maly). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  8. Heidegger, M. (2011). Varlık ve Zaman. (Çev. K. H. Ökten). İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı.
  9. Heidegger, M. (2013). Kant ve Metafizik Problem. (Çev. Z. Aşkın & R. Akalın). Ethos: Felsefe ve Toplumsal Bilimlerde Diyaloglar, 6 (1), 149-161.
  10. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. (Trans. P. Guyer & A. W. Wood). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Kant, I. (2002). Ahlak Metafiziğinin Temellendirilmesi. (Çev. İ. Kuçuradi). Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu Yayınları.
  12. Mctaggart, J. E. (1908). The Unreality of Time. Mind, New Series, 68, 457-474.
  13. Salman, S. (2017). Heidegger’in Kant Okuması: Hayalgücü, Zaman ve Sonluluk. Felsefi Düşün, 8, 153-177.
  14. Şenkaya, C. (2014). Düşünenin Düşünüyorum’da Düşündüğü: Kant’ın Cogito Eleştirisi. Felsefi Düşün, 3, 142-157.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing