AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 11 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1633
Cite this article
11
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Musical Taste of Kant’s Transcendental Subject

Suat Soner Ernözlü1
Show Less
1 Independent Researcher of Philosophy 07058, Antalya , Turkey
BIJP 2021, 11(1), 305–320; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1633
Received: 4 August 2020 | Published online: 20 March 2021
© 2021 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Kant's aesthetic philosophy is linked to the transcendental subject consistently, considering the general philosophy of criticism. The role of the transcendental subject, in theoretical philosophy, therefore, serves the same function in aesthetic and moral philosophies. In this context, it is of necessity to consider the transcendental object while studying Kant’s philosophy. However, approaching the philosophy of music through the transcendental subject necessitates a focus on Kant's third critique, The Critique of Judgement But it also requires the preliminary acceptance that the third criticism is not separated from the first two critics as Kant’s philosophy of criticism should be evaluated together. This study aims to focus on some ideas that Kant put forward in The Critique of Judgement within the context of a philosophy of music and to examine the consistency of these findings with the philosophy of criticism on the transcendental subject. In this regard, as a result of the research, Kant's contributions to the field of philosophy of music have been evaluated.

Keywords
Kant esthetics
philosophy of music
transcendental subject
philosophy of criticism
taste.
References
  1. Cassirer, E. (1996). Kant’ın Yaşamı ve Öğretisi. (Çev. D. Özlem). İstanbul: İnkılap Kitabevi.
  2. Deleuze, G. (1995). Kant’ın Eleştirel Felsefesi. (Çev. T. Altuğ). İstanbul: Payel Yayınevi.
  3. Deleuze, G. (2015). Kant Üzerine Dört Ders. (Çev. T. Kılıç). İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
  4. Gracyk, T. & Kaina, A. (ed.) (2011). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Music. London: Routledge, 328-339.
  5. Grove, G. (ed.) (2009). Dictionary of Music and Musicians A.D. 1450-1880, vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Kant, I. (2010). Arı Usun Eleştirisi. (Çev. A. Yardımlı). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
  7. Kant, I. (2009). Pratik Aklın Eleştirisi. (Çev. İ. Kuçuradi). Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu Yayınları.
  8. Kant, I. (1977). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. (Trans. P. Carus). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  9. Kant, I. (2011). Yargı Yetisinin Eleştirisi. (Çev. A. Yardımlı). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
  10. Kivy, P. (2010). Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Oxford Universty Press.
  11. Locke, J. (2017). İnsan Anlağı Üzerine Bir Deneme (Çev. V. Hacıkadiroğlu). İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
  12. Matherne, S. (2014). Kant’s Expressive Theory of Music. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 72 (2), 129-145.
  13. Parret, H. (1998). Kant on Music and the Hierarchy of the Arts. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, o56 (3), 251-264.
  14. Schopenhauer, A. (1969). The World as Will and Representation, vol. I. (Trans. E. F. J. Payne). New York: Dover Publications.
  15. Sözen, M. & Tanyeli, U. (1992). Sanat Kavram ve Terimleri Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  16. Tunalı, İ. (2012). Estetik. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing