AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 10 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1628
Cite this article
0
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Scandalous Banality of Philosophy: Cynic Parrhesia and Counter-Conduct

Didar Deniz Altınkaya1
Show Less
1 İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi, Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 35620, İzmir, Turkey
BIJP 2020, 10(4), 1281–1301; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1628
Received: 28 July 2020 | Published online: 22 December 2020
© 2020 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Foucault's lectures at the Collège de France provide very rich resources on how the “critical attitude”, which Foucault sees as an alternative way emerging out of Kant’s philosophy and which he describes as a critical questioning on our actuality and ourselves, can take shape today. To reveal this opportunity, we will first focus on the concept of the “counter-conduct” which Foucault puts forward within the framework of his study on governmentality (1978), but does not continue to develop, and then his analysis on the Cynics (1984), which he deals within the context of his historical studies on the concept of parrhesia, a concept that had a special role in Ancient Greek culture. We will claim that the mode of life peculiar to the Cynics, established as a direct manifestation of truth, provides a very powerful example of the counter-conduct that aims at creating "otherness," therefore grants tools to support the existence of philosophy today, as a practice of transforming the world and creating possibilities for thinking, acting, and existing differently. We think that such a reading will both enrich Foucault's conception of counter-conduct and reveal that Cynic parrhesia, as a scandalous application of truth, sheds light on new ways of relating to our actuality and also to ourselves.

Keywords
Counter-conduct
otherness
ethos
critical attitude
parrhesia
true life.
References
  1. Allen, A. (2008). The Politics of Our Selves. New York: Columbia University Press.
  2. Branham, B. R. & Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1996a). Introduction. The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy. (Eds. B. R. Branham, & M.-O. Goulet-Cazé). California: University of California Press, 1-27.
  3. Branham, B. R. (1996b). Defacing the Currency: Diogenes’ Rhetoric and the Invention of Cynicism. The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy. (Eds. B. R. Branham, & M.-O. Goulet-Cazé). California: University of California Press, 81-104.
  4. Davidson, A. I. (2011). In Praise of Counter-Conduct. History of the Human Sciences, 24 (4), 25-41.
  5. Desmond, W. (2008). Cynics. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing.
  6. Foucault, M. (2010). The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982-1983. (Trans. G. Burchell). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Foucault, M. (2011). Özne ve İktidar: Seçme Yazılar 2. (Çev. O. Akınhay & I. Ergüden). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  8. Foucault, M. (2012). Cinselliğin Tarihi. (H. U. Tanrıöver). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  9. Foucault, M. (2014). Doğruyu Söylemek. (Çev. K. Eksen). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  10. Foucault, M. (2016). Güvenlik, Toprak, Nüfus: Collège de France Dersleri 1977-1978. (Çev. F. Taylan). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  11. Foucault, M. (2017). Hermenötiğin Kökeni. (Çev. Ş. Çiltaş Solmaz). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  12. Foucault, M. (2018). Hakikat Cesareti: Kendinin ve Başkalarının Yönetimi II. (Çev. A. Beyaz) İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  13. Gros, F. (2018). Derslerin Bağlamı. M. Foucault, Hakikat Cesareti: Kendinin ve Başkalarının Yönetimi II. (Çev. A. Beyaz) İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 299-312.
  14. Hegel, G. (2018). Felsefe Tarihi 1: Thales’ten Platon’a Grek Felsefesi. (Çev. D. B. Kılınç). İstanbul: NotaBene Yayınları.
  15. Kennedy, K. (1999). Cynic Rhetoric: The Ethics and Tactics of Resistance. Rhetoric Review, 18 (1), 26-45.
  16. Keskin, F. (2011). Sunuş: Özne ve İktidar. M. Foucault, Özne ve İktidar: Seçme Yazılar 2. (Çev. O. Akınhay & I. Ergüden). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, 11-24.
  17. Laertius, D. (2017). Ünlü Filozofların Yaşamları ve Öğretileri. (Çev. C. Şentuna). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  18. Lorenzini, D. (2016). From Counter-Conduct to Critical Attitude: Michel Foucault and the Art of Not Being Governed Quite So Much. Foucault Studies, 21, 7-21.
  19. Lotz, C. (2005). From Nature to Culture? Diogenes and Philosophical Anthropology. Human Studies, 28 (1), 41-56.
  20. Luxon, N. (2013). Crisis of Authority: Politics, Trust, and Truth-Telling in Freud and Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Monoson, S. S. (2000). Plato’s Democratic Entanglements: Athenian Politics and the Practice of Philosophy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  22. Navia, L. E. (1996). Classical Cynicism: A Critical Study. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  23. Navia, L. E. (1998). Diogenes of Sinope: The Man in the Tube. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  24. Ober, J. (1989). Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  25. Prozorov, S. (2017). Foucault’s Affirmative Biopolitcs: Cynic Parrhesia and the Biopower of the Powerless. Political Theory, 45 (6), 801-823.
  26. Shea, L. (2010). The Cynic Enlightenment: Diogenes in the Salon. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  27. Stanley, S. (2007). Retreat from Politics: The Cynic in Modern Times. Polity, 39 (3), 384-407.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing