AccScience Publishing / BIJP / Volume 10 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1532
Cite this article
3
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Four Philosophies of Technology

Mehmet Önal1
Show Less
1 İnönü Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü 44000, Malatya, Turkey
BIJP 2020, 10(1), 331–353; https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1532
Received: 30 October 2019 | Published online: 5 December 2020
© 2020 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

In this essay, Drengson develops some typologies of technology and philosophy. He first presents four possible understandings of "philosophy" and argues that philosophy is best understood as "a sort of jazz played with concepts." He further identifies four stages of technological development: Technological anarchy, technophilia, technophobia, and appropriate technology. The central criterion of demarcation is the dominant human attitude toward technology in each stage. Technological anarchy is a playful, anything goes stage, when the possibilities of technology are explored and when there is no dominant standard. Technophilia is the love of, and in some cases identification with technology. In this stage, as in the early stages of a love affair, one often will not notice the downsides, limits, and problems of technology. The "personation" discussed by Doug Browning is a good example of technophilia. Technophobia is a fear or hatred of technology. It goes beyond a reasoned awareness of negative effects and tends toward rejection. Dreng-son argues that appropriate technology, as a self-critical stage and attitude, is the most mature and philosophically rich. Appropriate technology urges us to balance all costs, maintain biodiversity, promote benign interactions between humans, non-human animals, and technology, and to promote human development. This view captures many of the insights and goals of current programs of sustainable development and sustainable, or green, engineering and design.

Keywords
Philosophy of technology
technological anarchy
technophilia
technophobia
appropriate technology.
References
  1. Barrett, W. (1978). The Illusion of Technique: A Search for Meaning in a Technological Civilization. New York: Anchor Press.
  2. Boulding, K. E. (1965). The Meaning of the 20th Century: The Great Transition. New York: Harper & Row.
  3. Commoner, B. (1972). The Closing Circle: Nature, Man and Technology. New York Bantam Books.
  4. Commoner, B. (1976). The Poverty of Power. New York: Knopf Doubleday.
  5. Dunn, P. D. (1978). Appropiate Technology: Technology with a Human Face. New York: Schocken Books.
  6. Durban, P. T. (Ed.) (1978-83). Research in Philosophy and Technology. 6 vols. Greenwich: JAI Press.
  7. Ellul, J. (1964). The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books.
  8. Fromm, E. (1968). The Revolution of Hope: Toward a Humanized Technology. New York: Bantam Books.
  9. Galbraith, I. K. (1967). The New Industrial State. New York: Signet Books.
  10. Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row.
  11. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.
  12. Jantsch, E. (1975). Design for Evolution. New York: George Braziller.
  13. Lovins, A. B. (1977). Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable Peace. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing.
  14. Mitcham, C. & Mackey, R. (Eds.) (1972). Philosophy and Technology. New York: Free Press.
  15. Mumford, L. (1967). The Myth of the Machine 1: Technics and Human Development. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  16. Mumford, L. (1970). The Myth of the Machine 2: The Pentagon of Power. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  17. Odum, E. (1971). Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
  18. Papanek, V. (1973). Design for the Real World. New York: Bantam Books.
  19. Roszak, T. (1978). Personal Planer. New York: Anchor Press.
  20. Schumcher, E. F. (1973). Small Is Beautiful: Eanomics As If People Mattered. New York: Harper & Row.
  21. Shepard, P. & McKinley, D. (Eds.) (1969). The Subversive Science: Essays Towards an Ecology of Man. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  22. Stavrianos, L. S. (1976). The Promise of the Coming Dark Age. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
  23. Tawney, R. H. (1948). The Acquisitive Society. New York: Harvest Books.
  24. Watt, J. (1974). The Titanic Effect. Stanford: Senaur and Associates.
  25. Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer Power and Human Reason. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
  26. Wilber, K. (1977). The Spearum of Consciousness. Wheaton: Quest Books.
  27. Young, A. M. (1976). The Reflexive Universe: Evolution of Consciousness. San Francisco: Delacorte Press.
Share
Back to top
Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Print ISSN: 1303-8303, Published by AccScience Publishing