Author :
Abstract
Bu çalışma, modern dönemde entelektüel alanda gerçekleştiği iddia edilen antroposentrik dönüşün felsefi teoloji alanındaki yansımasının bir neticesi olarak ortaya çıkan teolojik antropoloji disiplinine giriş niteliğinde bir araştırmayı içermektedir. Böylece, henüz teolojik antropoloji alanına dair kapsamlı bir kaynak içermeyen Türkçe literatüre katkı sağlanması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda ilk olarak teolojik çalışmalarda antropolojik yaklaşımın bir ihtiyaç ve zorunluluk olduğunu çalışmalarında vurgulayan Karl Barth, Karl Rahner ve Wolfhart Pannenberg'in görüşleri ışığında alanın felsefi arka planı ele alınmaktadır. Daha sonra, müstakil bir ilmi disiplin olarak teolojik antropolojinin belirlediği amaçlar doğrultusundaki güncel tartışma konuları ve metodolojik meseleleri incelenmektedir.
Keywords
Abstract
This article presents an introduction to theological anthropology, a discipline that resulted from the anthropocentric turn took place in the intellectual field in the modern era. By this means, it is aimed at contributing to the Turkish literature lacking in comprehensive studies dealing with theological anthropology. First, the philosophical background of the discipline has been examined in the light of the views of Karl Barth, Karl Rahner, and Wolfhart Pannenberg, who emphasise the need and significance of an anthropological approach in modern theological studies. Then, the contemporary discussion topics and methodological issues of theological anthropology as an independent field have been analysed in the light of the current literature.
Keywords
- Barth, K. (1960). Church Dogmatics 3: The Doctrine of Creation, part 2. (Trans H. Knight, G. W. Bromiley, J. K. S. Reid & R. H. Fuller). Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
- Barth, K. (1962). Church Dogmatics: A Selection. (Trans. G. W. Bromiley). New York: Harper Torch Books.
- Barth, K. (2015). Theology and Church: Shorter Writings 1920-1928. (Trans. L. P. Smith). Eugene: Wimpf and Stock Publications.
- Brugger, E. C. (2009). Psychology and Christian Anthropology. Edification Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology, 3 (1), 5-18.
- Callaway, K. & Strawn, B. (2020). Experimental Theology: Theological Anthropo- logy and the Psychological Sciences. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 48 (1), 3-17.
- Carr, A. (1973). Theology and Experience in the Thought of Karl Rahner. The Journal of Religion, 53 (3), 359-376.
- Clines, D. J. A. (1968). The Image of God in Man. Tyndale Bulletin, 19, 53-103.
- Cooper, J. W. (2016). Scripture and Philosophy on the Unity of Body and Soul: An Integrative Method for Theological Anthropology. The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology. (Eds. J. R. Farris & C. Taliaferro). London and New York: Routledge, 27-43.
- Cortez, M. (2016). Christological Anthropology in Historical Perspective: Ancient and Contemporary Approaches to Theological Anthropology. Michigan: Zondervan.
- Cortez, M. (2015). The Madness in Our Method: Christology as the Necessary Starting Point for Theological Anthropology. The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology. (Eds. J. R. Farris & C. Taliaferro). London and
- Cortez, M. (2010). Theological Anthropology: A Guide for the Perplexed. Wilthshire: T&T Clark.
- Cortez, M. (2007). What Does It Mean to Call Karl Barth a Christocentric Theo- logian. Scottish Journal of Theology, 60 (2), 1-17.
- Dahlstrom, D. O. (2000). Translator’s Forward. A. Losinger, The Anthropological Turn: The Human Orientation of the Theology of Karl Rahner. (Trans. D. O. Dahlstrom). New York: Fordham University Press, vii-xiv.
- Erickson, M. (2013). Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
- Farris, J. R. & Taliaferro, C. (2016). Introduction. The Ashgate Research Companion New York: Routledge, 1-6.
- Feuerbach, L. (2008). The Essence of Christianity. (Trans. G. Elliot). Walnut: MSAC Philosophy Group.
- Glasse, J. (1964). Barth on Feuerbach. The Harvard Theological Review, 57 (2), 69-
- Gonzales, M. A. (2007). Created in God's Image: An Introduction to Feminist Theologi- cal Anthropology. New York: Orbis Books.
- Hanoğlu, İ. (2014). Fahreddin er-Razi’de Felsefî-Teolojik Antropoloji. İstanbul: Araş- tırma Yayınları.
- Hanefi, H. (1978). Teoloji mi Antropoloji mi? (Çev. M. S. Yazıcıoğlu). Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (1), 505-531.
- Hodge, D. R. & Wolfer, T. A. (2008). Promoting Tolerance: The Imago Dei as an Imperative for Christian Social Workers. Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work, 27 (3), 297-313.
- Hollenbach, D. (2014). Human Dignity in Catholic Thought. The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. (Ed. M. Düwell, J. Braarvig, & R. Brownsword). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 250
- Krötke, W. (2000). The Humanity of the Human Person in Karl Barth’s Anthro- pology. The Cambridge Companion to Karl Barth. (Ed. J. Webster). New York: Cambridge University Press, 159-176.
- Langenfeld, A. & Lerch, M. (2018). Theologisch Anthropologie. Stuttgard: Verlag Ferdinard Schöningh.
- Losinger, A. (2000). The Anthropological Turn: The Human Orientation of the Theo- logy of Karl Rahner. (Trans. D. O. Dahlstrom). New York: Fordham University Press.
- Mengüşoğlu, T. (2017). İnsan Felsefesi. İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
- Moncher, F. J. (2009). Implications of Catholic Anthropology for Psychological Assessment. Edification Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology, 3 (1), 69
- Oberdorfer, B. (2010). Human Dignity and ‘Image of God’. Scriptura, 204, 231-239.
- Pannenberg, W. (2004). Anthropology in Theological Perspective. (Trans. M. J. O’Connell). Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
- Rahner, K. (1973). Theological Investigations, vol. 9. (Trans. G. Harrison). New York: The Seabury Press.
- Robinson, D. N. (2015). Theological Anthropology and the Brain Sciences. The Taliaferro). London and New York: Routledge, 73-79.
- Ruether, R. R. (2002). The Emergence of Christian Feminist Theology. The Cambridge Companion to Feminist Theology. (Ed. S. F. Parsons). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-22.
- Shults, F. L. (2003). Reforming Theological Anthropology after the Philosophical Turn to Relationality. Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
- Simango, D. (2016). The Imago Dei: A History of Interpretation from Philo to the Present. Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae, 42 (1), 172-190.
- Taylor, C. (2012). Benliğin Kaynakları. (Çev. S. G. Baş & B. Baş). İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
- Thweatt-Bates, J. (2016). Cyborg Selves: A Theological Anthropology of the Posthuman. Oxon: Routledge.
