The Axiological Paradigm of Virtual Community Multivector Nature as a Threat to Information Culture and National Security
Author :
Abstract
Makale, sanal toplulukların çok vektörlü temsilinin devlet kurumu ve güvenliği üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerinin yanı sıra sanal toplulukların türlerini ve özelliklerini incelemektedir. Güvenliğin a priori temel yaşamsal gereklilik değeri dolaylı olarak vurgulanır. Makale, modern iletişim kültürü çerçevesinde çalışma ilkelerini anlamak için sanal toplulukların ayırt edici özelliklerini tanımlamayı, sanal topluluklardan gelen bir toplum için tehdit ve riskleri özetlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bilginin korunması, ulusal ve küresel güvenlik için bir öncelik haline gelir. Bilgi güvenliği, bilgi dünyası, bilgi egemenliği, ulusal güvenliğin kültürel kodunun bileşenleridir. Anahtar mesaj, sanal topluluğun (anonimlik, karma kimlik, yapay statü, kitsch vb.'nin bir somutlaşmışı olarak) hem kişisel hem de ulusal güvenlik için tehdit oluşturan bilgi ve iletişim uyumsuzluğu için güçlü bir araç olduğunu iddia ediyor.
Keywords
Abstract
The article studies the kinds and specificities of virtual communities along with the capabilities of adverse effects of multivector representation of virtual communities on state institutions and security. The value of the security as a priori basic vital necessity is implicitly emphasized. The article aims to define the distinguishing features of virtual communities to understand their operational principles in the frame of modern communication culture and to outline threats and risks for a society coming from virtual communities. Protecting information becomes a priority for national and global security. Infosecurity, infosphere, and info sovereignty are constituents of the cultural code of national security. Key message claims that virtual community (as an embodiment of anonymity, mixed identity, artificial status, kitsch, etc.) is a powerful tool for information and communication discord, which poses a threat to both personal and national security.
Keywords
- Affleck, J., & Kvan, T. (2008). A Virtual Community as the Context for Discursive
- Affleck, J., & Kvan, T. (2008). A Virtual Community as the Context for DiscursiveInterpretation: A Role in Cultural Heritage Engagement. // International Jour- nal of Heritage Studies, 14(3), 268–280. doi:10.1080/13527250801953751
- Aleksandrova, О., & Khrypko, S. (2020). Solitude as a Problem of Human’s MatureChoice. // Beytulhikme Int J Phil 10 (3) 2020, 771–785. doi: 10.18491/bey- tulhikme.1582
- Astafieva, O. N. (2002). Sinergeticheskii podkhod k issledovaniiu sotsiokulturnykhprotsessov: vozmozhnosti i predely [Synergetic approach to investigating sociocultural processes: opportunities and limitations]. Moscow: RAGS.
- Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2020). The dearest of our possessions: Applying Flo-ridi's information privacy concept in models of information behavior and in-formation literacy. // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Tech- nology, 71(9), 1030–1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24367
- Bodnar, I. R. (2011). Zakhody derzhavy u formuvanni informatsiinoi polityky [Thestate's techniques in shaping the information policy] // Visnyk LKA (Ekonomika), 34, 291–96.
- Carneiro, R. (2007). The Big Picture: understanding learning and meta-learningchallenges // European Journal of Education, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2007, 151–172.
- Clarke J. (2006). Public nightmares and communitarian dreams: the crisis of thesocial in social welfare // in S. Edgell, K. Hetherington and A. Warde (eds) Consumption Matters. – Oxford: Blackwell.
- Dutta, S. (2016). Philosophy of information: range and tenets. Annals of Library andInformation Studies, 63(2), 91–102. http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/ALIS/ar- ticle/view/9714
- Dzioban, O. P. (2006). Informatsiina bezpeka v umovakh globalizatsiinykh ten-dentsii: do problemy osmyslennia sutnosti. [Information security in globaliza-tion tendencies: the issue of understanding the essence]. Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA. – Issue 24.
- Dziundziuk, V. (2011). Virtualni spivtovarystva: potentsiina zagroza dlia natsional-noi bezpeky. [Virtual communities: potential threats to national security]. // Derzhavne budivnytstvo, 1.
- Haider, J. & Sundin, O. (2020). Information literacy challenges in digital culture:conflicting engagements of trust and doubt. // Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851389
- Hassan, N., & Mingers, J. (2018). Reinterpreting the Kuhnian Paradigm in Infor-mation Systems. // Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(7), 568– 599. doi:10.17705/1jais.00502
- Horban, O., & Maletska, M. (2019). Basic hermeneutic approaches to interpreta-tion of videogames. // Skhid, (5(163), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.21847/1728- 9343.2019.5(163).181868
- Horban, O., Martych, R., & Maletska, M. (2020). Phenomenon of Videogame Cul-ture in Modern Society. // Studia Warmińskie, 56, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.4314
- Khrypko, S. & Iatsenko, G. (2019 a). Philosophy of a Name: Ukrainian Context. // Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 9 (2), 437–451.
- Khrypko S., & Iatsenko G. (2019 b). Philosophy of a Surname: Ukrainian Context. // Beytulhikme: An International Journal of Philosophy, 9(4), 899–912.
- Kononov, S. V., & Zhukov, A. V. (2020). The philosophy of security in the global-izing culture system. // Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(3), 415–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.2848
- Kremliova, S. O. Setevye soobshchestva. [Network communities]. Last modified: Janu-ary, 1, 2005. https://hr-portal.ru/article/so-kremleva-setevye-coobshchestva
- Leshchev, S. V. (2002). Kommunikativnoe, sledovatelno, kommunikatsionnoe [It’s com- municative, therefore, it’s communicatory]. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
- Levyk, B., Aleksandrova, O., Khrypko, S., Iatsenko, G. (2020). Geo-policy andGeo-psychology as Cultural Determinants of Ukrainian Religion, Mentalityand National Security. // Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9, 217. doi:10.7596/taksad.v9i3.2761
- Meyrowitz, J. (2005). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behav- iour. – New York: Oxford University Press.
- Mingers, J., & Standing, C. (2017). What is information? Toward a theory of infor-mation as objective and veridical. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 85– 104. doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0038-6
- Ottosen, R. (2008). Targeting the Audience: Video Games as War Propaganda inEntertainment and News. // Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 14–41. https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v2i1.2862
- Peleshchyshyn, A. M., Fedushko, S. S. (2010). Liudyna. Kompiuter. Komunikatsiia.[The person. The computer. The communication]. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic Na- tional University, 88–90.
- Peleshchyshyn, A. M., Khymytsia, N. O. (2014). Virtualni spilnoty yak seredovyshchegeneruvannia viiskovo-istorychnoi informatsii pro podii 2014–2015 na skhodiUkrainy. [Virtual communities as an environment of generating the military-historical information about the events of 2014–2015 in the East of Ukraine].– Lviv Polytechnic National University Institutional Repository http://ena.lp.edu.ua
- Peleshchyshyn, A. M., Kravets, R. B., Serov, Yu. O. (2011). Analiz isnuiuchykh typivvirtualnykh spilnot u merezhi internet ta pobudova modeli virtualnoi spilnotyna osnovi web-forumu. [Analysis of the existing types of virtual communitieson the Internet and a formation of a model of virtual community on thegrounds of a web forum]. // Visnyk of Lviv Polytechnic National University, 681, 212–221.
- Rheingold, H. (1994). A slice of life in my virtual community. Global networks: com- puters and international communication, 57–80.
- Roszak, T. (2006). The Cult of Information: The Folklore of Computers and the True Art of Thinking. – Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.
- Skorodumova, O. B. (2004). Kultura informatsionnogo obshchestva [The culture of the information society]. Moscow: RSGU.
- Squire, K. (2006). From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience.Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035008019
- Tardini, S. & Cantoni, L. (2005). A Semiotic Approach to Online Communities:Belonging, Interest and Identity in Websites’ and Videogames’ Communities. // IADIS International Conference e-Society, 371–378.
- Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: Morrow.
- Turonok, S. G. (2004). Subculture of Internet communities. Culture of Russia as its stra-tegic resource. Notebooks of the International University (in Moscow): Collec- tion of scientific works, vol. 2, 208–221.
- Tymovchak-Maksymets, O. Yu. (2010) Modeliuvannia protsesu obminu dosvidomna web-forumakh shliakhom analizu rozgortannia dyskusii [Modelling of anexperience exchange process on web forums via analysis of the discussion de-velopment]. // Visnyk of Lviv Polytechnic National University, 689, 323–331.
- Wellman, B. (2002). Community Studies: An Introduction to the Sociology of the Local Community. – London: Allen and Unwyn.
- Wriston, W. (1999). The Twilight of Sovereignty. – New York: Charles Scribner.
- Xiao Q. (2003). China’s Virtual Revolution // Project Syndicate. – https://www.pro-ject-syndicate.org/commentary/china-s-virtual-revolution?barrier=accesspay- log
- Yalcinkaya, Y. (2016). Digital Culture and Digital Library. // Turkish Librarianship, 30(4), 595–618. http://www.tk.org.tr/index.php/TK/article/view/2727
