Author :
Abstract
Araştırmanın odak noktası, 1989-1991 yıllarında Orta Avrupa ve Ukrayna'daki devrimci olayların sosyo-kültürel önkoşullarının yanı sıra teorik ve tarihsel arka plan üzerindedir. Güçlü geleneksel ve modern bileşenlere sahip olan orta Avrupa'daki sivil toplum, siyasi hedefleri şekillendiren kültürel olarak şartlandırılmış bir Avrupa Sosyal kurumu olarak hareket etti. Aksine, zayıf entelektüel yansıma nedeniyle, Ukrayna toplumu derin siyasi değişimler için teorik kavramsallaştırma ve kültürel önkoşullardan yoksundu. Sivil toplumun gelişimi için ahlaki düzenleyici ve tanımlayıcı koşullar tam olarak uygulanmamıştır. Aydınlar, Orta Avrupa ülkelerindeki sosyo-kültürel ve tarihi değişimlerde öncü güçtü. Ukrayna'daki entelektüel topluluğun zayıflığı, sömürge söylemine bağımlılığı, komünizm sonrası yenilenme süreçlerinin ve yeni kurulan Ukrayna Devletinde sivil toplumun temellerinin kristalleşmesinin ciddi bir komplikasyonuna yol açtı.
Keywords
Abstract
The focus of the research is on the theoretical and historical background as well as socio-cultural preconditions of revolutionary events in Central Europe and Ukraine in 1989-1991. Having powerful traditional and modern components, civil society in Central Europe acted as a culturally conditioned European social institution that shaped political objectives. On the contrary, due to weak intellectual reflection, Ukrainian society lacked theoretical conceptualization and cultural preconditions for deep political changes. The moral-regulatory and descriptive conditions for the development of civil society have not been fully implemented. Intellectuals were the leading force in the socio-cultural and historical changes in Central European countries. The weakness of the intellectual community in Ukraine, its dependence on colonial discourse has led to a serious complication of the processes of post-communist renewal and of the crystallization of the foundations of civil society in the newly established Ukrainian state.
Keywords
- Akkerman, B. (1992). The Future of Liberal Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Andrukhovych, Yu. (2007). Moya Yevropa. Lviv: VNTL-Klassyka.
- Andruchowytsch, J. (2002). Europa wyobraźni. Dyskusja. Slowo polskie, 23.05.
- Arato, A. (1984). The Democratic Theory of the Polish Opposition: Normative Intentions and Strategic Ambiguities. Working paper 15, April. Notre Dame: Kellog Institute.
- Aron, R. (1994). In Defense of Political Reason: Essays. New York: Rowman & Little- field.
- Bakuła, B. (2011). Polska i kolonialna przeszłość dzisiaj. Nowa Krytyka, 26-27, 145- 180.
- Bilotserkivets’, N. (1998). Kryven’ka kachechka, abo Shche raz pro tragediyu Tsentral’no-Skhidnoyi Yevropy. Krytyka, 2(4), 4-6.
- Bob, C. (2005). The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activ- ism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Bolton, J. (2014). Worlds of Dissent. Charter 77, the Plastic People of the Universe, and Czech Culture under Communism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Brzechczyn, K. (2020). The Historical Distinctiveness of Central Europe. A Study in the Philosophy of History. Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien: Peter Lang.
- Chornovil, V. (1967). Lykho z rozumu. Portrety dvadtziaty zlochyntsiv. Paris.
- Dobrzański, D. (2013). Zasada solidarności. Studium z filozofii społecznej. Poznan: Wyd. Naukowe UAM.
- Dzielski, M. (1985). Odrodzenie ducha – budowa wolności: Pisma zebrane. Kraków: Znak.
- Dzyuba, I. (1998). Internatsionalizm chy rusyfikatsiya? Kyiv: Kyyevo-Mohylianska akademiya.
- Eisenstadt, S. (2009). Utopia i nowoczesność: porównawcza analiza cywilizacji. Warszawa: Oficyna naukowa.
- Gouldner, A. (1980). The Two Marxisms: Contradictions and Anomalies in the Develop- ment of Theory. New York: Palgrave.
- Górski, E. (2006). John Paul II’s Idea of Universalism. Dialogue and Universalism, 16, 7-34. Doi: 10.5840/du20061611/122.
- Gundorova, T. (2013). Tranzytna kul’tura. Symptomy postkolonial’noyi travmy. Kyiv: Grani-T.
- Habermas, J. (1984) (1981). Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, Mass: Beacon Press.
- Havel, V. (1985) [1978]. The Power of the Powerless: Citizens Against the State in Cent- ral-Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: M.E.Sarpe.
- Hroch, M. (1990). How Much Does Nation Formation Depend on Nationalism? East European Politics and Sovieties, 4 (1), 101-115.
- Hrytsak, Y. (2014). Revolution der Wurde. Maidan! Ukraine, Europe. (Ed. C. Dathe & A. Tostek). Bonn, 72-78.
- Jedlicki, J. (1999). Historical memory as a source of conflicts in Eastern Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 8(32), 225-232.
- Keen, M., Mucha, J. (2014). Autobiographies of Transformation: Lives in Central and Eastern Europe. London, New York: Routledge.
- Kelertas, V. (1998). Perceptions of the Self and the Other in Lithuania Postcolo- nial Fiction. World Literature Today, 2 (72), 253-261.
- Kilas, Y. (2013). Is There any Sociological Tradition of Social Memory Research? The Polish and the Czech Case. Polish Sociological Review, 3(183), 297-316.
- King, L.P., Szelenyi, I. (2004). Theories of the New class. Intellectuals and Power. Min- neapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
- Kis’, R. (1993). Rosiys’ka mesians’ka ideya: stare vyno u starykh mekhakh. Suchas- nist’, 2(382), 61-68.
- Konopásek, Z. (еd.) (2000). Our Lives as Database: Doing A Sociology of Oursel- ves (Czech Social Transitions in Autobiographical Dialogues). Prague: Karolinum Press.
- Kornilov, V.V. (2011). Donetsko-Krivorozhskaya respublika. Rasstreliannaya mechta. Kharkov: Folio.
- Król, M. (1993). Między korporacją a spoleczeństwem obywatelskim. Obywatel: Odrodzenie pojęcia. (Ed. B.Markiewicz). Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
- Kundera, M. (1996). The Tragedy of Central Europe. From Stalinism to Pluralism. A Documentary History of Eastern Europe since 1945. (Ed. G.Stokes). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kuroń, J. (2010). Opozycja: Pisma Polityczne 1969-1989. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
- Lukyanenko, L. (1994). Rozshyreny proekt programy Ukrayins’koyi Robitnycho- Selians’koyi spilky URSR. Ne dam zagynut’ Ukrayini. Kyiv, 10-35.
- Marszałek-Kawa, J., Plecka, D. (2015). Political Culture and the Democratisation of a Political Regime. The Case of Poland after 1989. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 3(2), 27-43.
- Michnik, A. (1987). Letters From Prison and Other Essays. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Minakov, M. (2017). Novorossiya and the Transnationalism of Unrecognized Post-Soviet Nations. Transnational Ukraine? Networks and Ties that Influence(d) Contemporary Ukraine. (Ed. T.Beichelt, S.Worschech). Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag, 65-88.
- Modrzejewski, A. (2016). The personalistic aspect of truth and dialogue in the con- text of Karol Wojtyła’s philosophy: John Paul II’s ethics of media. Communication Today, 7 (1), 4–16.
- Moore, D. C. (2001). Is the Post- in Post-Conial the Post-in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association of America), Volume 116, Number 1, January 2001, 111–128.
- Narvselius, E. (2012). Ukrainian Intelligentsia in Post-Soviet L’viv. Naratives, Identity and Power. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2012.
- Nijakowski, L. (2008). Polska polityka pamięci. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
- Ost, D. (2014) (1991). Solidarność a politika antypolityki. Historia Solidarności. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
- Pasko, Y., Korzhov, H. (2020). Community of Values as a Key Factor of Decolo- nization. Beytulhikme: An International Journal of Philosophy, 1(10), 25-42.
- Pavlyshyn, M. (1997). Kanon ta ikonostas. Kyiv: Chas.
- Proniuk, Y. (2012). Stan i zavdannia ukrayins’koho vyzvol’nogo rukhu. Za khlib ne platiat’ svobodoyu. Kyiv.
- Riabczyk, M. (2015). Ukraina. Syndrom postkolonialny. Wroclaw-Wojnowice: KEW.
- Seligman, A. (1995). The Idea of Civil Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Siermiński, M. (2016). Decada przełomy. Polska lewica oppozycyina 1968-1980. Warszawa: Ksiązka a Prasa.
- Staniszkis, J. (1992). The Ontology of Socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sverstiyk, Ye. (1999). Na sviati nadiy. Vybrane. Nasha vira. Kyiv: Suchasnist’.
- Szacka, B. (2006). Czas przeszły: pamięc – mit. Warszawa: Scholar.
- Szacki, J. (1994). Liberalizm po komunizme. Warszawa: Znak.
- Szelenyi, I. (1989). The prospects and the limits of the East European new class project: An auto-critical reflection on the intellectuals on the road to the class power. Politics and Society, 15(2), 103-144.
- Šubrt, J. (1995). Memory as a Subject of Sociological Investigation. Crossroads of Transition. A Czech-Slovene Colloquium. (Ed. J. Šubrt, & N. Toš). Praha: Philosophical Faculty, Charles University, 7-31.
- Tichner, J. (2000). Etyka solidarności. Kraków: Znak.
- Traba, R. (2009). Przeszłość w teraźniejszości. Polskie spory o historię na początku XXI wieku. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
- Trencsenyi, B., Kopecek, M., Licjak Gabrijelcic, L., Falina, M., Baar, M., Janowski, M. (2018). A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe. Oxford:
- Ukrayinka, L. (1977). Ne tak tiyi vorogy, yak dobri liudy. Zibrannia tvoriv: U 12 tomakh. T.8. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 19-25.
- Ukrayins’ky natsional’ny front: Doslidzhennia, dokumenty, materialy (2000). Lviv.
- Vozniak, T. (2014). Sens Maidanu (The Sense of Maidan). Maidan. Revoliutsiya du- khu. (Ed. A.Mukhars’kiy). Kyiv: Nash Format, 82-90.
- Walicki, A. (1984). Myśli o sytuacji politycznej i moralno-psychologicznej w Polsce. Aneks, 35, 82-104.
- Wawrzyniak, J., Pakier, M. (2013). Memory Studies in Eastern Europe: Key Issues and Future Perspectives. Polish Sociological Review, 3(183), 257-281.
- Wiatr, J. (1988). Marks i Hegel: państwo, społeczeństwo, legitymizacja. Legitymacja: Klasyczne teorie i polskie doświadczenia. (Ed. A. Rychard, & A. Sułek). Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
- Wierzbicki, P. (1985). Myśli staroświeckiego Polaka. Warszawa: Puls Publications.
- Zabuzhko, O. (2007). Notre Dama d’Ukraine: Ukrainka v konflikti mifologii. Kyiv: Fakt.
- Załęski, S. (2012). Neoliberalizm i społeczeństwo obywatelskie. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
- Załyski, M. (2008). Widmo Nacionalizmu. Intelligentsia w Polsce. Specjaliści, twórcy, klerkowie, klasa średnia. (Ed. H.Domański). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFIS PAN. Öz: Araştırmanın odak noktası, 1989-1991 yıllarında Orta Avrupa ve Ukrayna'daki devrimci olayların sosyo-kültürel önkoşullarının yanı sıra teorik ve tarihsel arka plan üzerindedir. Güçlü geleneksel ve modern bileşenlere sahip olan orta Avrupa'daki sivil toplum, siyasi hedefleri şekillendiren kültürel olarak şartlandırılmış bir Avrupa Sosyal kurumu olarak hareket etti. Aksine, zayıf entelektüel yansıma nedeniyle, Ukrayna toplumu derin siyasi değişimler için teorik kavramsallaştırma ve kültürel önkoşullardan yoksundu. Sivil toplumun gelişimi için ahlaki düzenleyici ve tanımlayıcı koşullar tam olarak uygulanmamıştır. Aydınlar, Orta Avrupa ülkelerindeki sosyo-kültürel ve tarihi değişimlerde öncü güçtü. Ukrayna'daki entelektüel topluluğun zayıflığı, sömürge söylemine bağımlılığı, komünizm sonrası yenilenme süreçlerinin ve yeni kurulan Ukrayna Devletinde sivil toplumun temellerinin kristalleşmesinin ciddi bir komplikasyonuna yol açtı. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sivil toplum, Kadife devrimler, komünizm sonrası dönüşüm, Doğu Orta Avrupa, Ukrayna.
