Author :
Abstract
Makale Polonya ve Ukrayna'daki sömürgecilik sorunlarıyla ilgileniyor. Kolonizasyon mirasının ortadan kaldırılması sürecinde ulusal toplulukların gelişiminin ahlaki düzenleyici ve işlevsel temelleri arasındaki ilişki irdelenir. Yazarlar, iki devletteki sosyal değişimin en aktif güçleri olan Dayanışma ve Maidan toplulukları tarafından şekillendirilen sömürgeciliğin iki versiyonu arasındaki zıtlığı analiz etmeye çalışıyorlar. Bu sosyal gruplar, geleceğin belirli entelektüel ve sosyal vizyonlarının taşıyıcıları olarak hareket eder ve belirli tarihsel ve değer belirleyicilerini temsil eder. Makale, Orta Avrupa ve Rus sosyo-kültürel etkileri ile ilgili, kayırmacılığın ve boyun eğdirmenin boyutlarıyla çelişen özgürlük değerlerinin oluşumuna ilişkin teorik yaklaşımları genellemektedir. Araştırma, Ukrayna toplumunun çoğunlukla Orta Avrupa topluluklarının mirasını ihmal ettiğini doğrulamaktadır: toplumsal sosyal deneyim, dayanışma ve sosyal pragmatizm. Kurumsal ve yaşam dünyası (Lebenswelt) düzeylerinde, 2014 Onurun Devrimi olayları sırasında son derece alakalı olan ve Yanukoviç sömürge rejiminin devrilmesine yol açan değerler ve ilkeler şu anda göz ardı edilmektedir. Aksine, Polonya Dayanışması, güçlü entelektüel yansıması ve tarihsel geçmişi yeniden düşünmesi yoluyla topluma değerli bir değişim vizyonu sunmayı ve pratik gerçekleştirilmesini desteklemeyi başaran başarılı bir sömürgecilik karşıtı topluluk olarak düşünülebilir.
Keywords
Abstract
The article deals with the problems of decolonization in Poland and Ukraine. The relationship between the moral-regulatory and functional foundations of the development of national communities in the process of eliminating colonization heritage is scrutinized. The authors endeavor to analyze the contrast between the two versions of decolonization embodied by the most active forces of social change in the two states: Solidarity and Maidan communities. These social groups act as bearers of certain intellectual and social visions of the future, representing certain historical and value markers. The article generalizes theoretical approaches related to Central European and Russian socio-cultural influences relating to the formation of the values of freedom that conflict with the dimensions of clientelism and subjugation. The research confirms that Ukrainian society mostly neglects the heritage of Central European communities: communitarian social experience, solidarity, and social pragmatism. At the institutional and life-world (Lebenswelt) levels the values and principles that were extremely relevant during the events of the 2014 Revolution of Dignity and led to the overthrow of the Yanukovich colonial regime are currently ignored. On the contrary, Polish Solidarity can be considered a successful anti-colonial community which through its powerful intellectual reflection and rethinking of the historical past has been able to offer society a valuable vision of change and to uphold its practical realization.
Keywords
- Arato, A. (1984). The Democratic Theory of the Polish Opposition: Normative Intentions and Strategic Ambiguities. Working Paper 15, April, Kellog Institute.
- Ashcroft, B. & Griffiths, G. & Tiffin, H. (2002). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. London & New York: Routledge.
- Bhabha, H. (2004). The Location of Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Bottici, C. (2014). Imaginal Politics: Images beyond Imagination and the Imagi- nary. Washington: Columbia University Press.
- Dobrzański, D. (2013). Zasada Solidarności: Studium z Filozofii Społecznej. Poznan: Wyd. Naukowe UAM.
- Dzielski, M. (1995). Polityka Polska Dziś. Odrodzenie Ducha-Budowa Wolności: Pisma Zebrane. Kraków: Krakowskie Towarzystwo Przemysłowe, Znak, 919943.
- Dzyuba, I. (1998). Internationalism or Russification? Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.
- Etkind, A. (2011). Internal Colonization: The Imperial Experience of Russia. Moscow: Literaturnoye Obozreniye.
- Geremek, Bronisław. (1994). Spoleczeństwo Obywatelskie i Wspólczesność. Eu- ropa i Społeczeństwo Obywatelskie. Kraków: Znak.
- Hnatiuk, O. (2005). Farewell to Empire: Ukrainian Discussions on Identity. Kyiv: Osnovy.
- Hrytsak, Y. (2015). The Postcolonial is Not Enough. Slaviс Review, 4, 733-734.
- Hundorova, T. (2007). Postcolonial Ressentiment: the Ukrainian Case. From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective. (Ed. J. Korek). Huddinge: Södertörns Högskola, 103-113.
- John Paul II (1996). The Social Teaching of the Church as the Integral Part of its Mis- sion. Rome: Fundacia Jana Pavla II, Osrodec Documentacji Pontificatu. https://pbn.nauka.gov.pl/ sedno-webapp/persons/1552204/?& pageNo=2.
- Kappeler, A. (2001). The Russian Empire: A Multiethnic History. London: Routledge.
- Khrypko, S. & Iatsenko, G. (2019). Philosophy of a Surname: Ukrainian Con- text. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 9 (4), 899-912.
- Król, M. (1991). Święty Piotr i John Stuart Mill: Nowożytny Spór Między Ści- jaństwem a Liberalizmem. Res Publica, 46 (9-10), 2-23.
- Król, M. (1992). Liberalizm Strachu czy Liberalizm Odwagi. Kraków, Znak.
- Król, M. (1993). Między Korporacją a Społeczeństwem Obywatelskim. Obywatel: Odrodzenie Pojęcia. (Ed. B. Markiewicz). Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
- Lis, R. (2007). Fenomen Narodzin Spoleczeństwa Obywatelskiego w Polsce Ok- resu Schyłkowego Kommunizmu. Czas Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego. Między Teorią a Praktyką. (Ed. P. Borowiec & B. Krauz-Mozer). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 89-102.
- Mason, A. (2000). Community, Solidarity and Belonging. Levels of Community and their Normative Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Michnik, A. (1983). List z Mokotova: Grudniowe Rekolekcje. Krytyka, 16, 11-22.
- Novak, M. (1993). Liberalizm-Sprzymierzeniec czy Wróg Kościola: Nauczanie Społeczne Kościoła a Instytucje Liberalne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo W Drodze.
- Ost, D. (1991). Solidarity and the Politics of Anti-Politics: Opposition and Reform in Poland since 1968. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
- Pasko, Y. (2016). Introduction. Z. Krasnodębski. Demokracja Peryferij. (Trans. Y. Pasko & H. Korzhov & O. Beliakova). Kyiv: Talkom, 6-9.
- Pavlyshyn, M. (1992). Post-Colonial Features in Contemporary Ukrainian Culture. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies, 6 (2), 41-55.
- Riabchuk, M. (2002). Ukraine: One State, Two Countries with comments. Transit Online, 23.
- Riabczuk, M. (2015). Ukraina: Syndrom Postkolonialny. Wroclaw-Wojnowice.
- Said, E. (2007). Culture and Imperialism. Kyiv: Krytyka.
- Shore, М. (2018). Ukrainian Night: History of Revolution Closely. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.
- Snochowska-Gonzalez, C. (2012). Post-Colonial Poland: On an Unavoidable Misuse. East European Politics and Societies, 26 (4), 708-723.
- Snyder, T. (2015). Integration and Disintegration: Europe, Ukraine and the World. Slavic Review, 74 (4), 695-707.
- Sowa, J. (2011). Fantomowe Ciało Króla: Peryferyjne Zmagania z Nowoczesną Formą. Kraków: Universitas.
- Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- Sverstyuk, Y. (2014). Changing Winds of Time. Maidan: (R)evolution of Spirit. (Ed. A. Mukhars’ky). Kyiv: Nash Format, 118-129.
- Szacka, B. (2006). Czas Przeszły: Pamięc-Mit. Warszawa: Scholar.
- Thompson, E. (2000). Imperial Knowledge: Russian Literature and Colonialism. Westport & London: Greenwood Press.
- Thompson, E. (2010). Whose Discourse? Telling the Story in Post-Communist Poland. The Other Shore, 1 (1), 1-15.
- Tichner, J. (2000). Etyka Solidarności. Kraków: Znak.
- Touraine, A. (2013). Solidarność: Analiza Ruchu Społecznego 1980-1981. Gdansk: Eu- ropejskie Centrum Solidarności.
- Wagner, P. (2014). Does Europe Have a Cultural Identity? The Cultural Values of Europe. (Eds. H. Joas & K. Wiegandt). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera, 525-543.
- Weber, M. (1998). On Some Categories of the Sociology of Understanding. Socio- logy: General Historical Analysis. Kyiv: Osnovy, 104-156.
- Zabuzhko, O. (1997). Shevchenko’s Myth of Ukraine: An Attempt at Philosophical Analysis. Kyiv: Abris.
- Zhurzhenko, T. (2005). Myth on Two Ukraines. Perekriestki, 3-4. Öz: The article deals with the problems of decolonization in Poland and Ukraine. The relationship between the moral-regulatory and functional foundations of the development of national communities in the process of eliminating colonization heritage is scrutinized. The authors endeavor to analyze the contrast between the two versions of decolonization embodied by the most active forces of social change in the two states: Solidarity and Maidan communities. These social groups act as bearers of certain intellectual and social visions of the future, representing certain historical and value markers. The article generalizes theoretical approaches related to Central European and Russian socio-cultural influences relating to the formation of the values of freedom that conflict with the dimensions of clientelism and subjugation. The research confirms that Ukrainian society mostly neglects the heritage of Central European communities: communitarian social experience, solidarity, and social pragmatism. At the institutional and life-world (Lebenswelt) levels the values and principles that were extremely relevant during the events of the 2014 Revolution of Dignity and led to the overthrow of the Yanukovich colonial regime are currently ignored. On the contrary, Polish Solidarity can be considered a successful anti-colonial community which through its powerful intellectual reflection and rethinking of the historical past has been able to offer society a valuable vision of change and to uphold its practical realization. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sömürgecilik, komünizm sonrası dönüşüm, değerler topluluğu, dayanışma, Maidan.
