Africa’s Problem of Social Change, Dominant Social Paradigms and Key Values for Peace and Development
Author :
Abstract
This paper examines the issue of social order and social change understood as building the capacity for establishing mechanisms for the control and rectification of the physical and psychological realms of life and their consequences for national integration and human development in a developing society as Nigeria. A basic presumption of our study was that the human sciences largely can facilitate social change by over ridding the situation of imperviousness to change- anachronism, which cannot be easily disconnected from our turbulent multi-ethnicity and the real fact that much may have been left undone in the areas of reconciliation, tolerance, compassion for promoting a rectifiable socio-culturally well-ordered society. We propose ways of ensuring the stability of social roles and functions for conformity, rectitude and justice so as to attain the common good.<
Keywords
Abstract
This paper examines the issue of social order and social change understood as building the capacity for establishing mechanisms for the control and rectification of the physical and psychological realms of life and their consequences for national integration and human development in a developing society as Nigeria. A basic presumption of our study was that the human sciences largely can facilitate social change by over ridding the situation of imperviousness to change- anachronism, which cannot be easily disconnected from our turbulent multi-ethnicity and the real fact that much may have been left undone in the areas of reconciliation, tolerance, compassion for promoting a rectifiable socio-culturally well-ordered society. We propose ways of ensuring the stability of social roles and functions for conformity, rectitude and justice so as to attain the common good.<
Keywords
- Alder, C. (1992) Violence, Gender and Social Change. International Social Science Journal, 132, 267-275.
- Andersson, G. (1987). Creativity and Criticism in Science and Politics. Universitas, 29 (3), 193-199.
- Banjo, A. (2001). Some Humanistic Perspectives on the Nigerian Condition. The Humanistic Management of Pluralism: A Formula for Development in Nigeria (ed. A. E. Eruvbetine). Lagos: Murtab Press, 6-15.
- Brozen, Y. (1952). The Value of Technological Change. Ethics, 62 (4), 249-265.
- Cournand, A. (1982). Science and Society. Current, 239, 32-38.
- Dewey, J. (1974). Does Human Nature Change? Basic Problems of Philosophy (eds. D. J. Bronstein & Y. H. Krikorian & P. P. Wiener). New Jersey: PrenticeHall, 116-121.
- Dubos, R. (1970). On Controlling Technology. Current, 119, 36-37.
- Eboussi-Boulaga, F. (2000). The Topic of Change. African Philosophy as Cultural Inquiry (eds. I. Karp & D. A. Masolo). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 187-214.
- Gupta, R. K. (1985). Problems of Social Action. Universitas, 27 (4), 311-318.
- Johnson, H. M. (1960). Sociology: A Systematic Introduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Kuhn, A. (1974). The Logic of Social Systems. London: Jossey-Bassey Publishers.
- Kung, H. (1992). World Religions and World Ethos. Universitas, 34 (2), 79-85.
- Lessnoff, M. (1988). The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. An Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. G. H. R. Parkinson) London: Routledge, 784-803.
- Macbeath, A. (1955). The Need for a Social Philosophy. Philosophy, 113, 99-111.
- Macrae, D. (1968). Utilitarian Ethics and Social Change. Ethics, 78 (3), 188-198.
- Magee, B. (1987). The Great Philosophers. London: BBC Books.
- Mair, L. P. (1960). Social Change in Africa. International Affairs, 36 (4), 447-456.
- Mathur, D. C. (1975). The Concept of Existence and the Contemporary Crisis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 35 (3), 391-395.
- Merrill, R. (1980). Philosophical Monism, Humanistic Pluralism, and the Decline of the Humanities. Humanities in Society, 3 (4), 335-349.
- More, M. & al. (2013). Transhumanist Declaration (2012). The Transhumanist Rea- der: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (eds. M. More & N. Vita-More). West Sussex: WileyBlackwell, 54-55.
- Ogude, S. E. (2001). Humanising Development in a Technological Age: The Chal- lenge for the 21st Century. The Humanistic Management of Pluralism: A Formula for Development in Nigeria (ed. A. E. Eruvbetine). Lagos: Murtab Press, 16-20.
- Oladipo, O. (1996). Philosophy and the African Experience. Ibadan: Hope.
- Oluikpe, B. (1994). The Humanities in a Depressed Economy: What Option for Nigerian Universities? Journal of Liberal Studies, 4 (1-2), 12-26.
- Otite, O. & Ogionwo, W. (2003) An Introduction to Sociological Studies. Ibadan: Heinemann.
- Parsons, H. L. (1975). The Philosopher and Mankind’s Struggle for Value. Philoso- phy and Phenomenological Research, 36 (4), 246-252.
- Szent-Gyorgyi, A. (1970). Using the Spirit of Science. Current, 119, 37-39.
- Tighel, V. (2004). Social Change, Civil Society, and Tolerance: A Challenge for the New Democracies. Civil Society: Who Belongs? (eds. W. A. Barbieri & R. Magliola & R. Winslow). Washington D. C. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 125-133.
- Wilson, K. D. (1978). Forecasting Futures. Society, 15 (2), 22-27. Öz: Bu yazıda, en eski felsefe disiplini ve bilimlerin kraliçesi olan metafizik konusunda, onun aklın sınırları içerisinde niçin anlaşılamaz olduğu hakkında Kant’ın çözümlemelerinin kavramsal zemini üzerinde durulacaktır. Kant’a göre, metafiziksel yargılar, kendilerini mantıksal diye ifade ederek gerçekliğin bilgisini verdikleri savını dile getirirler. Yine de bu durum, yanılsama mantığından başka bir şey değildir. Metafizikle mantık arasındaki ilişkinin gerçek değil de kavramsal yapıya sahip olması, onun bir yanılsamadan oluştuğunu ifade eder. Anahtar Kelimeler: Kant, metafizik, eleştiri, önsel, sonsal, yargı, akıl, bilgi.
