Quick Access


Bu Dergi DOI ve Crosscheck üyesidir


Abstract


Epistemik Akranlar Arası Anlaşmazlık ve Bağımsızlık Prensibi
This paper argues that the proper epistemic response to peer disagreement should depend, in part, on our grounds for judging the other person to be an epistemic peer. In particular, it argues that we can violate David Christensen’s Independence principle if (a) our judgment that another person is an epistemic peer can only be established by track record judgments from the ground level, or (b) we put less trust in the reasons we relied on in judging the other person to be an epistemic peer than the reasons we relied on in arriving at the judgment that is the subject of our disagreement.

Keywords
Peer disagreement, independence principle, conciliationism, epistemic self-trust.


Advanced Search


Announcements

    Duyurular

    Beytulhikme pek çok indeks ve veritabanında dizinlenmektedir. Bunlardan bazıları şunlardır: Academic Journals Database • Akademia Sosyal Bilimler İndeksi (ASOS) • Arastirmax Sosyal Bilimler İndeksi • CiteFactor Academic Scientific Journals • EBSCO TOC Premier • European Reference Index for Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIH Plus) • Genamics Journal Seek • Index Islamicus • International Citation Index (ICI) • İSAM İlahiyat Makaleler Veritabanı • OCLC WorldCat • One Belt, One Road Reference Source • Philosopher’s Index • PhilPapers Index • Polska Bibliografia Naukowa (PBN) • Ulakbim Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Veritabanı • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory • WoS - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

     



Address :Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü, Ulus, ANKARA // Asos Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti., ELAZIĞ
Telephone :0850-305-5523 Fax :
Email :beytulhikme2011@gmail.com

Web Yazılım & Programlama Han Yazılım Bilişim Hizmetleri